Competition Between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success

2005/08/01 by Bonnie M. Meguid, BONNIE M. MEGUID · 1 voice · 106 citations
Social Sciences · #Electoral Systems and Political Participation #Populism, Right-Wing Movements #Social Policy and Reform Studies

paper · doi:10.1017/s0003055405051701

Abstract

What accounts for variation in the electoral success of niche parties? Although institutional and sociological explanations of single-issue party strength have been dominant, they tend to remove parties from the analysis. In this article, I argue that the behavior of mainstream parties influences the electoral fortunes of the new, niche party actors. In contrast to standard spatial theories, my theory recognizes that party tactics work by altering the salience and ownership of issues for political competition, not just party issue positions. It follows that niche party support can be shaped by both proximal and non-proximal competitors. Analysis of green and radical right party vote in 17 Western European countries from 1970 to 2000 confirms that mainstream party strategies matter; the modified spatial theory accounts for the failure and success of niche parties across countries and over time better than institutional, sociological, and even standard spatial explanations.

Citations

• What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data

Cited by

• Thinly Veiled: The Use of Femonationalist Speech in European Parliaments
• Far-right agenda setting: How the far right influences the political mainstream
• Measuring factional conflict: A comparative approach using party leadership contests
• When Populists Win but Are Excluded From Power: Explaining Post‐Electoral Dynamics of Democratic Satisfaction
• Going Against the Grain: Climate Change as a Wedge Issue for the Radical Right
• Niche Party Success and Mainstream Party Policy Shifts – How Green and Radical Right Parties Differ in Their Impact
• The Causal Effect of Radical Right Success on Mainstream Parties’ Policy Positions: A Regression Discontinuity Approach
• When Does Accommodation Work? Electoral Effects of Mainstream Left Position Taking on Immigration
• Value Shift: Immigration Attitudes and the Sociocultural Divide
• Citizen Satisfaction With Democracy and Parties’ Policy Offerings
• Credibility Versus Competition
• How the media cordon sanitaire crumbles: lessons from Germany
• Communicating a common front: mainstream party rhetoric and affective polarisation towards the radical right
• Immigration and social citizenship in times of crisis: deepening and broadening citizenship
• Whose Issue Is It Anyway? A New Look at the Meaning and Measurement of Issue Ownership
• Back to the Future? The Electoral Breakthrough of Far-Right Parties
• Tough Positions, Trustful Voters? How Mainstream Party Position-Taking on Immigration Shapes Political Trust and its Impact on Far-Right Voting
• Affective Polarization and the Populist Radical Right: Creating the Hating?
• Too Important to Ignore? Why Ambiguity and Broad Appeals Fail with Rising Issue Salience
• Media Platforming and the Normalisation of Extreme Right Views
• Does accommodation work? Mainstream party strategies and the success of radical right parties
• Legitimize or Delegitimize? Mainstream Party Strategy toward (Former) Pariah Parties and How Voters Respond
• Does mainstream populism work? Populist rhetoric and the electoral fortunes of mainstream parties
• Issue ownership and government participation: Explaining parties’ issue attention at the subnational level
• From the Streets to the Voting Booth: The Electoral Effect of Grassroots Mobilization Against the Far Right
• Competing on competence: the issue profiles of mainstream parties in Western Europe
• If you can't Beat them, Join them? Explaining Social Democratic Responses to the Challenge from the Populist Radical Right in Western Europe
• Voices Against the Populist Far-Right?
• Silent responsiveness: How public opinion affects party discourse on wedge issues
• How voter distributions, issue ownership, and position influence party emphasis
• The Growing Importance of Issue Competition: The Changing Nature of Party Competition in Western Europe
• Why accommodate? How niche pressure and intra-party divisions shape mainstream party strategies
• A formal model of party competition with salience
• The Radical Right as Niche Parties? The Ideological Landscape of Party Systems in Western Europe, 1980–2014
• Issue Diversification: Which Niche Parties Can Succeed Electorally by Broadening Their Agenda?
• Growing polarisation: ideology and attitudes towards climate change
• A Longitudinal Study on the Dynamic Relationship Between Affective Polarization and Radical Right’s Emergence: The Case of VOX in Spain
• A Question of Commitment: Investigating How Citizens Perceive Parties' Programmatic Responses to Competition
• Immigration into the mainstream: Conflicting ideological streams, strategic reasoning and party competition
• The failure of mainstream parties and the impact of new challenger parties in France, Italy and Spain
• The behaviour of populist parties in parliament. The policy agendas of populist and other political parties in the Italian question time
• It’s Not Polarization; It’s the Radicalization of the Political Right
• The Impact of Radical Right-Wing Parties on the Positions of Mainstream Parties Regarding Multiculturalism
• Political Parties and ‘the Immigration Issue’: Issue Ownership in Swedish Parliamentary Elections 1991–2010
• ‘It’s the economy, stupid’: when new politics parties take on old politics issues
• When does accommodation fail? The electoral consequences of intra-party divisions and mainstream party strategies
• Adopting restriction: how coalition governments respond to radical right parties
• Dimensions of political conflict and party positions in multi-level democracies: evidence from the Local Manifesto Project
• Varieties of Radicalism: Examining the Diversity of Radical Left Parties and Voters in Western Europe
• Strategies of mainstream parties towards their right-wing populist challengers: Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Finland in comparison
• “Stop the boats”: populist contagion and migration policymaking in the UK
• Mainstream parties and climate policy development: what role for intra-party politics?
• From a cultural to a distributive issue: Public climate action as a new field for comparative political economy
• Countering the “Climate Cult” – Framing Cascades in Far-Right Digital Networks
• Why Inequalities Persist: Parties’ (Non)Responses to Economic Inequality, 1970–2020
• Exploring the politics of degrowth – first evidence from two cases of repair policies in Austria and Sweden
• Who benefits from the social democratic march to the middle?
• Electoral pressure, reputational risks, and coalition politics: how established parties respond to the rise of anti-immigrant parties
• This land is our land: Radical right parties and the environmental issue in Europe
• Under pressure? How regional dominant parties shift their EU positions when challenged by Euroskeptic parties
• “And some, I assume, are good people”: Determinants of elites’ strategic discourse about immigrants and refugees
• Talking ‘about’ the far right as researchers: between responsibility, safety and neoliberal success
• Left-Wing Governments and Far-Right Success
• Ideology and voting in France: A weakening relationship?
• Political Advertising on Facebook During the 2022 Australian Federal Election: A Social Identity Perspective
• Do voters want their parties to be office- or policy-seekers in coalition negotiations?
• How much does issue salience matter? A model with applications to the UK elections
• Ideological bias in policy implementation: public opinion and policy outcomes in 43 democracies
• Do voters polarise in response to elite dissensus on immigration?
• When everyone talks about migration: how mainstream parties shift to the right and still lose
• Sympathizing with the radical right: Effects of mainstream party recognition and control of prejudice
• When is gender on party agendas? Manifestos and (De-)democratisation in Greece, Portugal, and Spain
• The Role of Organizational Institutionalization in Electoral Sustainability. A Comparative Analysis of the Spanish Far Right: Fuerza Nueva and VOX
• Green Party Entry and Conservative Backlash: Evidence from Germany
• The Electoral Implications of Coalition Policy Making
• The domestic politics of EU action against democratic backsliding: public debates in Hungarian and Polish newspapers
• Researching and Understanding Far-Right Politics in Times of Mainstreaming
• Perpetuating Crisis as a Supply Strategy: The Role of (Nativist) Populist Governments in EU Policymaking on Refugee Distribution
• The politics of health care: lessons for welfare state research
• Fighting for a Lost Cause? Availability of Populist Radical Right Voters for Established Parties. The Case of Germany
• Climate Sceptics or Climate Nationalists? Understanding and Explaining Populist Radical Right Parties’ Positions towards Climate Change (1990–2022)
• Radical or aligned? Assessing issue congruence between youth wing elites, parliamentary candidates and voters in Norway
• Voices of the party base: How supporters want established parties to respond to new parties
• The Image of the Communist Ideo-Political Legacy
• Green matters? The effects of green party support, autonomy and capacity on subnational environmental infringements
• How established parties reduce other parties’ electoral support: the strategy of parroting the pariah
• Democratic transition and party polarization: A fuzzy regression discontinuity design approach
• The ‘mainstream’ in contemporary Europe: a bi-dimensional and operationalisable conceptualisation
• Mainstream partisans’ affective response to (non) cooperation with populist radical right parties
• To what extent do political elites influence public opinion about immigration?
• On visibility and normalization: Parliamentary representation and media attention to radical right parties, leaders, and issues
• The consequences of appearing divided: An analysis of party evaluations and vote choice
• The Normalization of the Radical Right
• Voting for the Populist Radical-Right in Austria and Germany: A Comparative Analysis
• Populist electoral success and party system concentration: A cross-national analysis
• Politics and Religion in Secular Societies: The Prominence and Framing of Religion in Nordic Election Campaigns
• Immigration and Electoral Change in Mainstream Political Space
• Ethno-Regional Parties Cannot Be Everything to Everyone: Electoral Risks of a More Diverse Issue Agenda
• Which Factors Influence Issue Salience in Electoral Manifestos? New Insights From the Salience of Social Services in Dutch Local Elections
• Environmental attitudes, environmental problems and party choice. A large-N comparative study
• Inequality, macroeconomic performance and political polarization: a panel analysis of 20 advanced democracies
• Political party [wikipedia]
• Online network organization of Barcelona en Comú, an emergent movement-party. [europepmc]
• The Impact of COVID-19 on the Support for the German AfD: Jumping the Populist Ship or Staying the Course? [europepmc]
• EUPopLink Country report - Norway. [europepmc]
• Battling to dominate the discursive terrain: how Marine Le Pen and Emmanuel Macron have framed terrorist incidents on Twitter [europepmc]

Discussions

• Aber: Die Mehrheit der Forschung zeigt, dass solche Strategien selten klare Stimmengewinne versprechen. Was sie jedoch fast immer bewirken, ist eine Themenverschiebung hin zu jenen Politikfeldern, in [bsky, 5 points, 1 comments]

Related

• Why accommodate? How niche pressure and intra-party divisions shape mainstream party strategies
• Niche Party Success and Mainstream Party Policy Shifts – How Green and Radical Right Parties Differ in Their Impact
• Adaptation or inflexibility? Niche party responsiveness to policy competition, with evidence from regionalist parties
• The Role of Issue Salience and Competitive Advantages in Spatial Models of Political Competition
• Moderate as Necessary: The Role of Electoral Competitiveness and Party Size in Explaining Parties’ Policy Shifts