Does accommodation work? Mainstream party strategies and the success of radical right parties
2022/03/25 by Werner Krause, Denis Cohen, Tarik Abou‐Chadi · 8 voices · 43 citations
Social Sciences · #Populism, Right-Wing Movements #Electoral Systems and Political Participation #Gender Politics and Representation
paper · pdf · doi:10.1017/psrm.2022.8
Abstract
Abstract This research note investigates how mainstream party strategies affect the success of radical right parties (RRPs). It is a widespread view that mainstream party accommodation of radical right core issue positions would reduce the radical right's success. Empirical evidence for this claim, however, remains inconclusive. Using party level data as well as micro-level voter transitions between mainstream and RRPs, we re-evaluate the effectiveness of accommodative strategies and also test whether they work contingent on specific conditions, e.g., the newness of radical right challengers or the existence of a cordon sanitaire. We do not find any evidence that accommodative strategies reduce radical right support. If anything, our results suggest that they lead to more voters defecting to the radical right. Our findings have important implications for the study of multi-party competition as they challenge what has become a core assumption of this literature: that accommodative strategies reduce niche party success.
Citations
Cited by
- Does mainstream populism work? Populist rhetoric and the electoral fortunes of mainstream parties
- <i>Ready or not</i> . National identity, vote choice, and mass media: Evidence from Germany
- From the Streets to the Voting Booth: The Electoral Effect of Grassroots Mobilization Against the Far Right
- Public support for the <i>cordon sanitaire</i> : Descriptive evidence from Spain
- Discounting extreme positions: party normalization and support for the far right
- Voices Against the Populist Far-Right?
- How voter distributions, issue ownership, and position influence party emphasis
- Why accommodate? How niche pressure and intra-party divisions shape mainstream party strategies
- A Question of Commitment: Investigating How Citizens Perceive Parties' Programmatic Responses to Competition
- Mayors as gatekeepers? Local responses to the Alternative for Germany
- When Populists Win but Are Excluded From Power: Explaining Post‐Electoral Dynamics of Democratic Satisfaction
- Does far-right legislative entry affect minority candidate diversity?
- Immigration and social citizenship in times of crisis: deepening and broadening citizenship
- Democratic dissatisfaction, the far right, and party brand activation: lessons from the breakthrough (and downfall) of the Dutch New Social Contract
- Politics remains a team sport: On the continued relevance of studying party organization
- What makes ethnic majorities support the radical right? A combination of relative deprivation and social dominance approaches
- Mainstreaming vs. normalisation: Towards more conceptual clarity on how mainstream parties legitimise the far right
- When does accommodation fail? The electoral consequences of intra-party divisions and mainstream party strategies
- How the media cordon sanitaire crumbles: lessons from Germany
- Selectively (il)liberal: theory and evidence on nativist disidentification
- Partisan affect and political tolerance in the context of shifting norms: the effect of coalition signals towards the radical right
- Communicating a common front: mainstream party rhetoric and affective polarisation towards the radical right
- Re-Stigmatizing the Radical Right: A One-Way Street?
- Cleavage size and stability in turbulent times: introducing the bloc volatility and fragmentation dataset
- Populism, the far right and EU integration: beyond simple dichotomies
- The mainstreaming of the far right and democratic erosion. Three analytical pathways
- Electoral pressure, reputational risks, and coalition politics: how established parties respond to the rise of anti-immigrant parties
- Under pressure? How regional dominant parties shift their EU positions when challenged by Euroskeptic parties
- When everyone talks about migration: how mainstream parties shift to the right and still lose
- Authenticity Over Imitation: Lessons from the 2025 German Election
- When is gender on party agendas? Manifestos and (De-)democratisation in Greece, Portugal, and Spain
- The pretence of the cordon sanitaire: non-collaboration as a distraction from discursive congruence
- Green Party Entry and Conservative Backlash: Evidence from Germany
- The young, the radical and the dissatisfied: the transformation of the Portuguese right-wing electorate in the 21 <sup>st</sup> century
- The stigma on right-wing parties: perceptions and voting behaviour
- Vom „totalen Migrationsstaat“ zum „Ordnungsstaat“. Über die Rechtsstaatsverständnisse der Neuen Rechten
- Voices of the party base: How supporters want established parties to respond to new parties
- To what extent do political elites influence public opinion about immigration?
- Legitimising prejudice? The impact of radical right party presence on anti-immigration attitude expression
- Careless whisper: Political elite discourses activate national identities for far‐right voting preferences
- Voting for the Populist Radical-Right in Austria and Germany: A Comparative Analysis
- Populist electoral success and party system concentration: A cross-national analysis
- Firewall against the far-right in Germany [wikipedia]
Discussions
- 2) More anti-immigrant positions do not weaken the radical right Our research shows that when established parties move to the right on immigration this does not weaken the radical right but if anythin [bsky, 214 points, 3 comments]
- Which would be a mistake. Exhibit A: doi.org/10.1017/psrm... Exhibit B: doi.org/10.1080/1350... [bsky, 13 points, 0 comments]
- Schönes Best-Practice-Beispiel für den journalistischen Verweis auf wissenschaftliche Forschung! Wenn man hier z. B. oben auf den hinterlegten Link klickt, kommt man direkt zu: Krause, W., Cohen, D., [bsky, 10 points, 0 comments]
- Krause et al. (2022) "We do not find any evidence that accommodative strategies reduce radical right support. If anything, our results suggest that they lead to more voters defecting to the radical r [bsky, 6 points, 0 comments]
- Folge: Mehr Menschen betrachten radikale Parteien als legitime und wählbare Alternative. Und dann wählt man doch lieber gleich das Original. – Im Zweifel führt das dann eher zu einem *Anstieg* des Wäh [bsky, 4 points, 1 comments]
- Würde hier beginnen: doi.org/10.1017/psrm... [bsky, 2 points, 1 comments]
- Reacting to the success of the radical right (and sometimes, radical left), we have seen mainstream parties across the EU adopt more anti-immigration and Eurosceptic sentiments. However, plenty of res [bsky, 2 points, 1 comments]
- In meiner Bubble helfen tatsächlich wissenschaftliche Paper, insbesondere in Bezug auf den Umgang mit der AFD. Funktioniert besonders, wenn ich es zutreffender Weise so rüberbringe, dass ich der Frag [bsky, 1 points, 0 comments]
Related