To what extent do political elites influence public opinion about immigration?

2026/07/14 by Tiphaine Le Corre, Jane Green, Alexander Yeandle · 1 voice
Social Sciences · #Migration, Refugees, and Integration #Populism, Right-Wing Movements #Social and Intergroup Psychology

paper · pdf · doi:10.1017/s1475676526101388

openalex publication_date 2026/07/14 · openalex created_date 2026/07/15 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/21

Abstract

Abstract Considerable attention has been devoted to understanding individual-level factors shaping immigration attitudes. However, we know far less about the top-down influence of political elites on such attitudes. In this review, we synthesise scholarly evidence to examine how elite discourse affects public opinion about immigration. We propose that immigration preferences are best understood through three dimensions of public opinion: attitude extremity (the degree to which individuals support or oppose immigration), attitude importance (the extent to which they consider immigration to be an important issue), and attitude expression (the behavioural manifestation of immigration attitudes). Our review suggests that elite rhetoric has a limited effect on the extremity of immigration attitudes, as these preferences are typically rooted in long-standing belief systems and shaped early in life. Isolating the influence of elites on the importance of immigration as an issue is more complex, as shifts in public concern often coincide with changes in elite discourse and media coverage, all of which are shaped by external events. However, our review indicates that political elites can play a significant role in shaping the expression of immigration attitudes – both at the ballot box and in everyday social interactions. These insights have important implications for identifying pressing research gaps and for understanding the politicisation of immigration in contemporary politics.

Citations

• Aging, Cohorts, and the Stability of Sociopolitical Orientations Over the Life Span
• Fueling the Fire: Violent Metaphors, Trait Aggression, and Support for Political Violence
• Cinderella and her ugly sisters: the mainstream and extreme right in Europe's bipolarising party systems
• Government policy and citizen passion: A study of issue publics in contemporary America
• The Impact of Radical Right-Wing Parties on the Positions of Mainstream Parties Regarding Multiculturalism
• The Stability of Political Attitudes and Behaviors across Adolescence and Early Adulthood: A Comparison of Survey Data on Adolescents and Young Adults in Eight Countries
• The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion
• Public Opinion Toward Immigration Reform: The Role of Economic Motivations
• A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus
• Competition Between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success
• Taking cues on multidimensional issues: the case of attitudes toward immigration
• Antiminority Riots in Unified Germany: Cultural Conflicts and Mischanneled Political Participation
• Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study
• How established parties reduce other parties’ electoral support: the strategy of parroting the pariah
• Does Exposure to the Refugee Crisis Make Natives More Hostile?
• Do Anti-Immigrant Laws Shape Public Sentiment? A Study of Arizona’s SB 1070 Using Twitter Data
• Seeing the World Through the Other's Eye: An Online Intervention Reducing Ethnic Prejudice
• The Causal Effect of Radical Right Success on Mainstream Parties’ Policy Positions: A Regression Discontinuity Approach
• A Rising Tide? The Salience of Immigration and the Rise of Anti‐Immigration Political Parties in Western Europe
• Cosmopolitan Immigration Attitudes in Large European Cities: Contextual or Compositional Effects?
• Can Terrorism Abroad Influence Migration Attitudes at Home?
• The Evolution of the Immigration Debate: Evidence from a New Dataset of Party Positions Over the Last Half-Century
• The Trump Effect: An Experimental Investigation of the Emboldening Effect of Racially Inflammatory Elite Communication
• Discrete Events and Hate Crimes: The Causal Role of the Brexit Referendum
• When Does Accommodation Work? Electoral Effects of Mainstream Left Position Taking on Immigration
• Value Shift: Immigration Attitudes and the Sociocultural Divide
• The Stability of Immigration Attitudes: Evidence and Implications
• Does accommodation work? Mainstream party strategies and the success of radical right parties
• Attitude Strength
• Do Anti-immigration Voters Care More? Documenting the Issue Importance Asymmetry of Immigration Attitudes
• Numbers, Selectivity, and Rights: The Conditional Nature of Immigration Policy Preferences
• European attitudes to refugees after the Russian invasion of Ukraine
• News and Public Opinion: Which Comes First?
• Media Reflect! Policy, the Public, and the News
• Blame it on my youth: the origins of attitudes towards immigration
• Beyond Changing Minds: Raising the Issue Importance of Expanding Legal Immigration
• The Free Movement of People and the Success of Far-Right Parties: Evidence from Switzerland’s Border Liberalization
• From Extreme to Mainstream: The Erosion of Social Norms
• How Issue Salience Explains the Rise of the Populist Right in Western Europe
• On the salience of political issues: The problem with ‘most important problem’
• The Normalization of the Radical Right

Discussions

• To what extent do political elites influence public opinion about immigration? doi.org/10.1017/S147... Paper in @ejprjournal.bsky.social by @nuffieldcollege.bsky.social student Tiphaine Le Corre, Fell [bsky, 1 points, 0 comments]

Related

• Taking cues on multidimensional issues: the case of attitudes toward immigration
• Do voters polarise in response to elite dissensus on immigration?
• Blame it on my youth: the origins of attitudes towards immigration
• Misperceptions about Immigration: Reviewing Their Nature, Motivations and Determinants
• Thinking Globally about Attitudes to Immigration: Concerns about Social Conflict, Economic Competition and Cultural Threat