Issue Diversification: Which Niche Parties Can Succeed Electorally by Broadening Their Agenda?

2019/07/30 by Matthew E. Bergman, Matthew E Bergman, Henry Flatt · 5 citations
Social Sciences · #Electoral Systems and Political Participation #Populism, Right-Wing Movements #Social Media and Politics

paper · doi:10.1177/0032321719865538

Abstract

This work proposes an explanation for nationalist party success based on successful issue competition. Niche parties, it has been argued, gain votes by concentrating on their “owned” issues, such as environmentalism for green parties and mono-culturalism for nationalists. We argue that nationalist parties may increase their vote share by engaging in issue competition with mainstream parties and expanding the diversity of issues emphasized in their platforms. Because of their position and ideology, green parties are not able to engage in such an electoral strategy. Relatedly, no such reward exists for nationalist parties in well-documented majoritarian systems. In party systems with a size typical of proportional systems, we find that as nationalist parties broaden their issue agenda from highly specialized positions, they are able to increase their vote share. Our findings have significant implications for the study of party–voter issue linkages and party competition in fragmented political space.

Citations

• The silent counter-revolution
• “Effective” Number of Parties
• What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data
• The Populist Zeitgeist
• An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy
• Who sets the agenda and who responds to it in the Danish parliament? A new model of issue competition and agenda‐setting
• Competition Between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success
• If you can't Beat them, Join them? Explaining Social Democratic Responses to the Challenge from the Populist Radical Right in Western Europe
• Is Populism an Ideology? A Refutation and a New Perspective
• Moderate as Necessary: The Role of Electoral Competitiveness and Party Size in Explaining Parties’ Policy Shifts
• The Radical Right as Niche Parties? The Ideological Landscape of Party Systems in Western Europe, 1980–2014
• Niche Party Success and Mainstream Party Policy Shifts – How Green and Radical Right Parties Differ in Their Impact

Cited by

• The behaviour of populist parties in parliament. The policy agendas of populist and other political parties in the Italian question time
• Do more inclusive parties change less? Intraparty democracy and programmatic change
• Competing on competence: the issue profiles of mainstream parties in Western Europe
• This land is our land: Radical right parties and the environmental issue in Europe
• Continuity and change: The role of nativism and gender attitudes in the long-term dynamics of radical right party support

Related

• Competition Between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success
• Niche Party Success and Mainstream Party Policy Shifts – How Green and Radical Right Parties Differ in Their Impact
• Adaptation or inflexibility? Niche party responsiveness to policy competition, with evidence from regionalist parties
• The Growing Importance of Issue Competition: The Changing Nature of Party Competition in Western Europe
• ‘It’s the economy, stupid’: when new politics parties take on old politics issues