Affective Polarization in Comparative and Longitudinal Perspective
2023/02/01 by Diego Garzia, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Simon Maye · 109 citations
Chemistry · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Sciences · #Affect (linguistics) #Chemistry #Communication #Electoral Systems and Political Participation #Longitudinal study #Mathematics #Polarization (electrochemistry) #Political science #Populism, Right-Wing Movements #Psychology #Social Media and Politics #Social psychology #Statistics
paper · pdf · doi:10.1093/poq/nfad004
published in Public Opinion Quarterly 87(1), 219-231 (Oxford University Press)
openalex publication_date 2023/02/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/06
Abstract
Existent research shows that affective polarization has been intensifying in some publics, diminishing in others, and remaining stable in most. We contribute to this debate by providing the most encompassing comparative and longitudinal account of affective polarization so far. We resort to a newly assembled dataset able to track partisan affect, with varying time series, in eighteen democracies over the last six decades. We present results based on two different operational measures of affective polarization: Reiljan's Affective Polarization Index, based on reported partisans only, and Wagner's weighted distance from the most liked party, based on the whole electorate. Our reassessment of affective polarization among partisans confirms that an intensifying trend is observable in a number of countries but it is, by no means, generalizable to all established democracies. Regarding the longitudinal assessment of affective polarization among the electorate, we confirm that US citizens have become more affectively polarized over time.
Citations
Cited by
- The (alleged) consequences of affective polarization: A survey experiment in nine democracies
- The shades of (un)productive disagreement: A systematic literature review and a hierarchical taxonomy
- A game of tariffs: is there demand for tariffs in Europe?
- Establishing the construct and predictive validity of brief measures of affective polarization
- The affective nature of affective polarization: Evidence from physiological and self‐reported responses to US politicians
- In-Party Love, Out-Party Hate, and Affective Polarization in Twelve Established Democracies
- United in success, fragmented in failure: The moderating effect of perceived government performance on affective polarization between coalition partners
- Unaffected polarization? Populism and affective polarization in comparative perspective
- Trapped in a Vicious Cycle of Political Negativity and Incivility on Social Media? Yes, but Only Before Elections
- Affective Polarization towards Parties and Leaders, and Electoral Participation in 13 Parliamentary Democracies, 1980–2019
- Estimating affective polarization on a social network
- Partisanship and the Social Construction of Deservingness in the United States
- Election Outcomes and Affective Polarization in the United States
- Micropolarization: performances of antagonism and struggles for recognition during the COVID-19 pandemic
- Conflict on the campaign trail? How campaign effort and electoral competitiveness shape affective polarization
- Is Partisan Selective Exposure an American Peculiarity? A Comparative Study of News Browsing Behaviors in the United States, Japan, and Hong Kong
- Does polarization increase participation? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis
- Political polarization in low- and middle-income countries
- The Evolution of Public Opinion Over Gay Rights in Switzerland
- Ideological identity, issue-based ideology and bipolar affective polarization in multiparty systems: The cases of Argentina, Chile, Italy, Portugal and Spain
- Measuring affective polarization: Matching concepts to measures
- Ideological and affective polarization in multiparty systems
- Putting the affect into affective polarisation. [europepmc]
- Bubble reachers and uncivil discourse in polarized online public sphere. [europepmc]
- The influence of perceived threat on the motive attribution asymmetry bias for groups in conflict. [europepmc]
- Estimating affective polarization on a social network. [europepmc]
- Political polarization threatens fairness and reciprocity in the USA. [europepmc]
- Negative partisanship, positive partisanship, and variation in climate policy attitudes on the political right. [europepmc]
Related