2026/05/22 by Eelco Harteveld, Lars Erik Berntzen, Andrej Kokkonen +3 · 12 citations
Psychology · Social Sciences · #Antipathy #Democracy #Elite #Law #Polarization (electrochemistry) #Political economy #Political science #Politics #Psychology #Social Media and Politics #Social and Intergroup Psychology #Social psychology #Sociology #Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
paper · pdf · doi:10.1017/s1475676526101273
published in European Journal of Political Research, 1-19 (Wiley)
openalex created_date 2022/10/03 · openalex publication_date 2026/05/22 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/21
Abstract Affective polarization (or antipathy between supporters of opposing political camps) is considered a threat to societal cohesion and democratic stability worldwide. However, causal evidence of its impact remains scarce, especially outside the United States. Our study examines the individual-level consequences of affective polarization by manipulating it in a survey experiment in nine countries (Brazil, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States; N ≈ 18,000) and subsequently assessing the downstream consequences for social avoidance and discrimination of opponents, support for aggression, aversion to political compromise, democratic norms, democratic dissatisfaction, and political engagement. Our intervention successfully reduced participants’ affective polarization in six out of nine countries. In turn, this was associated with significant improvement in interpersonal relations and (in contrast to recent US studies) support for democratic norms. Importantly, the impact varied between societies, suggesting that the consequences of affective polarization may be more context-dependent than previously understood.