Measuring affective polarization: Matching concepts to measures
2026/07/26 by James N. Druckman, James Druckman, Samara Klar +3 · 1 voice
Social Sciences · #Electoral Systems and Political Participation #Populism, Right-Wing Movements #Social Media and Politics
paper · pdf · doi:10.1111/pops.70152
openalex publication_date 2026/07/26 · openalex created_date 2026/07/28 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Abstract
Abstract Affective polarization is the extent to which partisans like their own party relative to their dislike of opposing parties. High levels of affective polarization in the United States and many other countries have prompted widespread scholarly interest and practical concern. Yet, despite nearly 15 years of scholarship, significant uncertainty remains about how best to measure affective polarization. We offer a comprehensive review focused on the measurement of affective polarization, underscoring how seemingly innocuous choices can yield substantially different results. These include the target of evaluation (e.g., engaged ideologues, ordinary voters), the dimensions of evaluation (e.g., liking/disliking, moralization), the measurement context (e.g., whether respondents are interviewed by an interviewer or complete surveys independently) and the political context (e.g., the power relationship between parties). We conclude that the next generation of inquiry will need to more carefully align measures of affective polarization with specific research questions.
Citations
- Consequences of Reducing Nonresponse in a National Telephone Survey
- Does Politics Influence Hiring? Evidence from a Randomized Experiment
- Nonresponse and Mode Effects in Self- and Interviewer-Administered Surveys
- The Politics of Interpersonal Trust and Reciprocity: An Experimental Approach
- Affect, Not Ideology
- Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization
- The Hostile Audience: The Effect of Access to Broadband Internet on Partisan Affect
- Of Artifacts and Partisan Instability
- Political Homophily in Social Relationships: Evidence from Online Dating Behavior
- The Limits of Partisan Prejudice
- Apples to Oranges or Gala versus Golden Delicious?
- “It could turn ugly”: Selective disclosure of attitudes in political discussion networks
- The Economic Consequences of Partisanship in a Polarized Era
- Americans, Not Partisans: Can Priming American National Identity Reduce Affective Polarization?
- Polarized Mass or Polarized Few? Assessing the Parallel Rise of Survey Nonresponse and Measures of Polarization
- The Parties in Our Heads: Misperceptions about Party Composition and Their Consequences
- Affective Polarization or Partisan Disdain?
- The effect of partisanship and political advertising on close family ties
- When Common Identities Decrease Trust: An Experimental Study of Partisan Women
- When Efforts to Depolarize the Electorate Fail
- The Home as a Political Fortress: Family Agreement in an Era of Polarization
- The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States
- What Do We Measure When We Measure Affective Polarization?
- Political Considerations in Nonpolitical Decisions: A Conjoint Analysis of Roommate Choice
- The Group Basis of Partisan Affective Polarization
- ‘Fear and loathing across party lines’ (also) in Europe: Affective polarisation in European party systems
- Are there Still Limits on Partisan Prejudice?
- Correlation with Time Explains the Relationship between Survey Nonresponse and Mass Polarization
- Divided by the Vote: Affective Polarization in the Wake of the Brexit Referendum
- Can Interparty Contact Reduce Affective Polarization? A Systematic Test of Different Forms of Intergroup Contact
- Partisan ideological attitudes: Liberals are tolerant; the intelligent are intolerant.
- Affective Polarization in Multiparty Systems? Comparing Affective Polarization Towards Voters and Parties in Norway and the United States
- Political sectarianism in America
- Reducing Affective Polarization: Warm Group Relations or Policy Compromise?
- Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America
- The Consequences of Personality Biases in Online Panels for Measuring Public Opinion
- The Nature of Affective Polarization: Disentangling Policy Disagreement from Partisan Identity
- (Mis)estimating Affective Polarization
- How Affective Polarization Undermines Support for Democratic Norms
- Identity, Beliefs, and Political Conflict
- Affective Polarization and the Populist Radical Right: Creating the Hating?
- Reluctant Republicans, Eager Democrats?
- A Psychology of Ideology: Unpacking the Psychological Structure of Ideological Thinking
- Political Surveys Bias Self-Reported Economic Perceptions
- Correcting inaccurate metaperceptions reduces Americans’ support for partisan violence
- The Way we Were: How Histories of Co-Governance Alleviate Partisan Hostility
- Does Affective Polarization Undermine Democratic Norms or Accountability? Maybe Not
- Polarization Eh? Ideological Divergence and Partisan Sorting in the Canadian Mass Public
- Affective Polarization in Comparative and Longitudinal Perspective
- Ideological identity, issue-based ideology and bipolar affective polarization in multiparty systems: The cases of Argentina, Chile, Italy, Portugal and Spain
- Camps, not just parties. The dynamic foundations of affective polarization in multi-party systems
- The Effects of Polarized Evaluations on Political Participation: Does Hating the Other Side Motivate Voters?
- Rethinking Political Polarization
- Inter‐attitude centrality does not appear to reduce persuasion for political attitudes
- Is Affective Polarization Driven by Identity, Loyalty, or Substance?
- Polarisation, identity and affect - conceptualising affective polarisation in multi-party systems
- Affective polarization and coalition signals
- What Do We Measure When We Measure Affective Polarization across Countries?
- Social Desirability and Affective Polarization
- Partisan Antipathy and the Erosion of Democratic Norms
- What explains elite affective polarization? Evidence from Canadian politicians
- Affective polarization within parties
- A Threat to Cohesion: Intragroup Affective Polarization in the Context of Intractable Intergroup Conflict
- Need for Chaos and Dehumanization are Robustly Associated with Support for Partisan Violence, While Political Measures are Not
- Generalizing toward Nonrespondents: Effect Estimates in Survey Experiments Are Broadly Similar for Eager and Reluctant Participants
- Both‐Sideology Endangers Democracy and Social Science
- Megastudy testing 25 treatments to reduce antidemocratic attitudes and partisan animosity
- Ideology: Psychological Similarities and Differences Across the Ideological Spectrum Reexamined
- Affective Polarization towards Parties and Leaders, and Electoral Participation in 13 Parliamentary Democracies, 1980–2019
- Asymmetric polarization: The perception that Republicans pose harm to disadvantaged groups drives Democrats’ greater dislike of Republicans in social contexts.
- A New Measure of Affective Polarization
- Identity after the ballot: How winning and losing impact partisan attachments and affective polarization
- An Audit of Social Science Survey Experiments
- Election Outcomes and Affective Polarization in the United States
- Continuity and Change in Trust in Scientists in the United States: Demographic Stability and Partisan Polarization
Discussions
Related