The Hostile Audience: The Effect of Access to Broadband Internet on Partisan Affect
2015/12/23 by Yphtach Lelkes, Gaurav Sood, Shanto Iyengar · 476 citations
Psychology · Social Sciences · #Advertising #Affect (linguistics) #Broadband #Business #Computer science #Electoral Systems and Political Participation #Hostility #Internet access #Media Studies and Communication #Media consumption #New media #Polarization (electrochemistry) #Political science #Psychology #Social Media and Politics #Social psychology #Telecommunications #The Internet #World Wide Web
paper · doi:10.1111/ajps.12237
published in American Journal of Political Science 61(1), 5-20 (Wiley)
openalex publication_date 2015/12/23 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/04
Abstract
Over the last two decades, as the number of media choices available to consumers has exploded, so too have worries over self‐selection into media audiences. Some fear greater apathy, others heightened polarization. In this article, we shed light on the latter possibility. We identify the impact of access to broadband Internet on affective polarization by exploiting differences in broadband availability brought about by variation in state right‐of‐way regulations (ROW). We merge state‐level regulation data with county‐level broadband penetration data and a large‐N sample of survey data from 2004 to 2008 and find that access to broadband Internet increases partisan hostility. The effect occurs in both years and is stable across levels of political interest. We also find that access to broadband Internet boosts partisans' consumption of partisan media, a likely cause of increased polarization.
Citations
Cited by
- The political consequences of Africa's mobile revolution
- Moving towards informative and actionable social media research
- The role of partisan news and political parasocial relationships in shaping meta‐perceptions: Cross‐national evidence
- Polarization, Partisan Sorting, and the Politics of Education
- (Mis-)Perceptions, information, and political polarization: A survey and a systematic literature review
- Social Media Effects on Public Trust in the European Union
- The relationship between offline partisan geographical segregation and online partisan segregation
- Spiral of Silence: How Neutral Moderation Polarizes Content Creation
- Party Animals? Extreme Partisan Polarization and Dehumanization
- Megastudy testing 25 treatments to reduce antidemocratic attitudes and partisan animosity
- Does Talking to the Other Side Reduce Inter-party Hostility? Evidence from Three Studies
- News Cycles and Satisfaction With Democracy: How the Pandemic Short-Circuited Media Polarization
- The Effect of Social Media on Elections: Evidence from The United States
- Mainstream partisans’ affective response to (non) cooperation with populist radical right parties
- Is Partisan Selective Exposure an American Peculiarity? A Comparative Study of News Browsing Behaviors in the United States, Japan, and Hong Kong
- The Impact of Increased Learning Opportunities on Political Knowledge: Evidence From Repeated Cross-Sectional Surveys in Finland in 2008 and 2020
- The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States
- Does the Method Affect the Outcome? How Measures of Partisan Slant of Media Outlets and Affective Polarization Drive Results About Polarization in the United States
- Political polarization in low- and middle-income countries
- Affective Polarization in Political and Nonpolitical Settings
- Patterns, Models, and Challenges in Online Social Media: A Survey
- Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response
- The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies
- Narcissism and Affective Polarization
- Measuring affective polarization: Matching concepts to measures
- Dynamics of Polarizing Rhetoric in Congressional Tweets
- How to study democratic backsliding
- Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts
- Do External Threats Unite or Divide? Security Crises, Rivalries, and Polarization in American Foreign Policy
Related