2016/09/01 by Felix Vaux, Steven A. Trewick, Mary Morgan‐Richards · 14 citations
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology · Earth and Planetary Sciences · #Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies #Genetic diversity and population structure #Evolution and Paleontology Studies #Cladogenesis #Biology #Genetic algorithm #Evolutionary biology #Jargon #Philosophy of biology #Dilemma #Modern evolutionary synthesis #Lineage (genetic) #Crypsis #Epistemology #Divergence (linguistics) #Ecology #Phylogenetics #Linguistics #Genetics #Philosophy of science
paper · pdf · doi:10.1111/bij.12872
published in Biological Journal of the Linnean Society (Oxford University Press)
openalex publication_date 2016/09/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/06/26
We respond to a comment by Allmon Here, we summarize a wealth of literature demonstrating that supposedly separate species introgress frequently, and we clarify that evolutionary lineage-splitting with genotypic and phenotypic divergence (speciation) is not the same as taxonomic classification. The usefulness of the terms anagenesis and cladogenesis requires agreement on their meaning, and this debate reflects a wider dilemma in academic communication: whether to use imprecisely defined jargon or longer sentences with simple words. We favour the latter, because biological evolution operates under straightforward and generalizable principles that should not require complicated descriptions, especially when its study requires collaboration among many disciplines.