1970/10/01 by L. E. Ballentine · 1 voice · 13 citations
Arts and Humanities · Chemistry · Mathematics · Physics and Astronomy · #Computer science #Consistent histories #EPR paradox #Hidden variable theory #History and advancements in chemistry #Interpretation (philosophy) #Interpretations of quantum mechanics #Mathematical economics #Mathematics #Minority interpretations of quantum mechanics #Outcome (game theory) #Philosophy and History of Science #Physics #Quantum #Quantum Mechanics and Applications #Quantum dynamics #Quantum entanglement #Quantum mechanics #Quantum probability #Quantum process #Quantum statistical mechanics #Relational quantum mechanics #Statistical physics #Stochastic interpretation #Theoretical physics
paper · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.42.358
openalex publication_date 1970/10/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
The Statistical Interpretation of quantum theory is formulated for the purpose of providing a sound interpretation using a minimum of assumptions. Several arguments are advanced in favor of considering the quantum state description to apply only to an ensemble of similarily prepared systems, rather than supposing, as is often done, that it exhaustively represents an individual physical system. Most of the problems associated with the quantum theory of measurement are artifacts of the attempt to maintain the latter interpretation. The introduction of hidden variables to determine the outcome of individual events is fully compatible with the statistical predictions of quantum theory. However, a theorem due to Bell seems to require that any such hidden-variable theory which reproduces all of quantum mechanics exactly (i.e., not merely in some limiting case) must possess a rather pathological character with respect to correlated, but spacially separated, systems.