1993/09/01 by Glenn Ellison · 6 citations
Decision Sciences · Social Sciences · #Game Theory and Applications #Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation #Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies #Computer science #Economics #Microeconomics #Mathematical economics
paper · doi:10.2307/2951493
openalex publication_date 1993/09/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/04
This paper discusses the dynamic implications of learning in a large population coordination game, focusing on the structure of the matching process which describes how players meet.As in Kandori, Mailath, and Rob (1993) a combination of experimentation and myopia creates "evolutionary" forces which lead players to coordinate on the risk dominant equilibrium.To describe play with finite time horizons it is necessary to consider the rates at which the dynamic systems converge.In large populations with uniform matching, play is determined largely by historical factors.In contrast, when players interact with small sets of neighbors it is more reasonable to assume that evolutionary forces may determine the outcome.