vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Electoral Reform and Strategic Coordination

2020/03/03 by Jon H. Fiva, Simon Hix · 3 citations
Social Sciences · #Electoral Systems and Political Participation #Gender Politics and Representation #Social Policy and Reform Studies

paper · doi:10.1017/s0007123419000747

openalex publication_date 2020/03/03 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/04

Abstract

Abstract Electoral reform creates new strategic coordination incentives for voters and elites, but endogeneity problems make such effects hard to identify. This article addresses this issue by investigating an extraordinary dataset, from the introduction of proportional representation (PR) in Norway in 1919, which permits the measurement of parties’ vote shares in pre-reform single-member districts and in the same geographic units in the post-reform multi-member districts. The electoral reform had an immediate effect on the fragmentation of the party system, due in part to strategic party entry. The authors find, though, that another main effect of the reform was that many voters switched between existing parties, particularly between the Liberals and Conservatives, as the incentives for these voters to coordinate against Labor were removed by the introduction of PR.

Citations

Cited by

Related