2008/01/22 by Qing‐Feng Sun, Qing-feng Sun, X. C. Xie +1 · 4 citations
Engineering · Materials Science · Physics and Astronomy · #Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design #Condensed matter physics #Current (fluid) #Electron #Graphene research and applications #Mesoscopic physics #Physics #Quantum and electron transport phenomena #Quantum mechanics #Spin (aerodynamics) #Spin Hall effect #Spin current #Spin polarization #Spin transistor #Spinplasmonics #cond-mat.mes-hall
paper · pdf · doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.035327
published as Phys. Rev. B 77, 035327 (2008) · 20 pages, 18 figures, the long version of Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 196801 (2007)
openalex publication_date 2008/01/22 · arxiv created 2008/06/13 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
We investigate two closely related subjects: (i) the existence of a pure persistent spin current without an accompanying charge current in a semiconducting mesoscopic device with a spin-orbit interaction (SOI) and (ii) the definition of the spin current in the presence of SOI. Through physical argument from four physical pictures in different aspects, we provide strong evidences that the equilibrium persistent spin current does exist in a device with SOI in the absence of any magnetic field or magnetic materials. This persistent spin current is an analog of the persistent charge current in a mesoscopic ring threaded by a magnetic flux, and it describes the real spin motion and can be measured experimentally. We then investigate the definition of the spin current. We point out that (i) the nonzero spin current in the equilibrium SOI device is the persistent spin current, (ii) the spin current is, in general, not conserved, and (iii) the Onsager relation is violated for the spin transport no matter what definition of the spin current is used. These issues, the nonzero spin current in the equilibrium case, the nonconserved spin current, and the violation of the Onsager relation, are intrinsic properties of spin transport. We note that the conventional definition of the spin current has very clear physical intuition and describes the spin motion very well. Therefore, we feel that the conventional definition of the spin current makes physical sense, and there is no need to modify it. (Note that this conclusion is not in contradiction with the opinions in our previous papers). In addition, the relationship between the persistent spin current and transport spin current, the persistent linear and angular spin currents in the SOI region of the hybrid ring, and the measurement of the persistent spin current are discussed. Finally, we show that if the spin-spin interaction is included into the Hamiltonian, the persistent spin current is automatically conserved using the conventional definition.