2025/11/14 by Matthew Cashman, Mattias Strandh, Björn Högberg
Psychology · Social Sciences · #Education, Achievement, and Giftedness #Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction #Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
paper · doi:10.1080/00313831.2025.2587963
crossref issued 2025/11/14 · crossref published 2025/11/14 · crossref published-online 2025/11/14 · openalex created_date 2025/11/14 · openalex publication_date 2025/11/14 · crossref created 2025/11/14 · crossref deposited 2025/11/14 · crossref indexed 2026/07/27 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Background This study aimed to identify distinct patterns of teaching practices in Swedish compulsory schools and their influence on adolescents’ subjective well-being, focusing on school satisfaction and stress. We differentiated among teacher-centered, student-centered, and student-dominated practices using a person-oriented approach.Methods Data were drawn from a nationally representative sample of 9th-grade students in the Swedish Evaluation through Follow-Up Survey. Latent class analysis identified teaching practice subtypes based on student perceptions, and linear regressions assessed differences in subjective well-being across these subtypes.Results Three distinct classes emerged: student-centered, student-dominated, and teacher-centered practices. Student-centered practices correlated with moderate school satisfaction, while student-dominated practices showed the highest satisfaction but increased stress. Teacher-centered practices resulted in the lowest satisfaction among the classes.Discussion Findings indicate that student-centered and student-dominated practices likely enhance subjective well-being, though overly autonomous settings may increase stress, underscoring the need for balanced instructional approaches.