The science of teamwork: Progress, reflections, and the road ahead.
2018/05/01 by Eduardo Salas, Denise L. Reyes, Denise Reyes +1 · 31 citations
Psychology · Computer Science · Social Sciences · #Team Dynamics and Performance #Software Engineering Techniques and Practices #Knowledge Management and Sharing
paper · doi:10.1037/amp0000334
Abstract
We need teams in nearly every aspect of our lives (e.g., hospitals, schools, flight decks, nuclear power plants, oil rigs, the military, and corporate offices). Nearly a century of psychological science has uncovered extensive knowledge about team-related processes and outcomes. In this article, we draw from the reviews and articles of this special issue to identify 10 key reflections that have arisen in the team literature, briefly summarized here. Team researchers have developed many theories surrounding the multilayered aspects of teams, such that now we have a solid theoretical basis for teams. We have recognized that the collective is often stronger than the individual, initiating the shift from individual tasks to team tasks. All teams are not created equal, so it is important to consider the context to understand relevant team dynamics and outcomes, but sometimes teams performing in different contexts are more similar than not. It is critical to have teamwork-supportive organizational conditions and environments where psychological safety can flourish and be a mechanism to resolve conflicts, ensure safety, mitigate errors, learn, and improve performance. There are also helpful teamwork competencies that can increase effectiveness across teams or tasks that have been identified (e.g., coordination, communication, and adaptability). Even if a team is made up of experts, it can still fail if they do not know how to cooperate, coordinate, and communicate well together. To ensure the improvement and maintenance of effective team functioning, the organization must implement team development interventions and evaluate relevant team outcomes with robust diagnostic measurement. We conclude with 3 main directions for scientists to expand upon in the future: (a) address issues with technology to make further improvements in team assessment, (b) learn more about multiteam systems, and (c) bridge the gap between theory and practice. In summary, the science of teams has made substantial progress but still has plenty of room for advancement. (PsycINFO Database Record
Citations
Cited by
- COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action.
- Astronomers Engaging with the Education Ecosystem: A Best-Evidence Synthesis
- Team leader humility and team proactive customer service behavior: A regulatory focus perspective
- Solving the Right Problem with Multi-Robot Formations
- Cultivating teamwork in esports: a framework for assessment and training
- The Task Space: An Integrative Framework for Team Research
- Advancing Teams Research: What, When, and How to Measure Team Dynamics Over Time. [europepmc]
- The Behavioral Biology of Teams: Multidisciplinary Contributions to Social Dynamics in Isolated, Confined, and Extreme Environments. [europepmc]
- Practical actions for fostering cross-disciplinary global health research: lessons from a narrative literature review. [europepmc]
- 'Team capital' in quality improvement teams: findings from an ethnographic study of front-line quality improvement in the NHS. [europepmc]
- Identifying strategies to promote team science in dissemination and implementation research. [europepmc]
- The Evolution and Maturation of Teams in Organizations: Convergent Trends in the New Dynamic Science of Teams. [europepmc]
- Communication and Teamwork During Telemedicine-Enabled Stroke Care in an Ambulance. [europepmc]
- Improving Teamwork Competencies in Human-Machine Teams: Perspectives From Team Science. [europepmc]
- Investigating voice in action teams: a critical review. [europepmc]
- Teaming up in primary care: Membership boundaries, interdependence, and coordination. [europepmc]
- Making Family-Centered Care for Adults in the ICU a Reality. [europepmc]
- Evaluation of nurses' experiences with digital storytelling workshop: New way to engage, connect, and empower. [europepmc]
- Editorial: Real-world implementation of the biopsychosocial approach to healthcare: Pragmatic approaches, success stories and lessons learned. [europepmc]
- Liderando juntos y revueltos: A collectivistic leadership approach to address Latinx immigrant health and psychological needs. [europepmc]
- Perceptions of Data Set Experts on Important Characteristics of Health Data Sets Ready for Machine Learning: A Qualitative Study. [europepmc]
- What can we learn from COVID-19?: examining the resilience of primary care teams. [europepmc]
- Behavioral sciences applied to acute care teams: a research agenda for the years ahead by a European research network. [europepmc]
- Perceptions of interprofessional team collaboration among professionals working in the occupational health service in Sweden. [europepmc]
- Physicians' challenges when working in the prehospital environment - a qualitative study using grounded theory. [europepmc]
- Joint problem-solving orientation, mutual value recognition, and performance in fluid teamwork environments. [europepmc]
- Model of multidisciplinary teamwork in hip fracture care: a qualitative interview study. [europepmc]
- Embedding Big Qual and Team Science into Qualitative Research: Lessons from a Large-scale, Cross-site Research Study. [europepmc]
- Speaking Up and Taking Action: Psychological Safety and Joint Problem-Solving Orientation in Safety Improvement. [europepmc]
- Psychological safety is associated with better work environment and lower levels of clinician burnout. [europepmc]
- Mutual information-based teamwork evaluation in real-world environments: an exploratory investigation with professional surgeons. [europepmc]
Related