How digital media drive affective polarization through partisan sorting
2022/10/10 by Petter Törnberg · 1 voice · 48 citations
Physics and Astronomy · Social Sciences · #Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence #Social Media and Politics #Electoral Systems and Political Participation
paper · doi:10.1073/pnas.2207159119
Abstract
Politics has in recent decades entered an era of intense polarization. Explanations have implicated digital media, with the so-called echo chamber remaining a dominant causal hypothesis despite growing challenge by empirical evidence. This paper suggests that this mounting evidence provides not only reason to reject the echo chamber hypothesis but also the foundation for an alternative causal mechanism. To propose such a mechanism, the paper draws on the literatures on affective polarization, digital media, and opinion dynamics. From the affective polarization literature, we follow the move from seeing polarization as diverging issue positions to rooted in sorting: an alignment of differences which is effectively dividing the electorate into two increasingly homogeneous megaparties. To explain the rise in sorting, the paper draws on opinion dynamics and digital media research to present a model which essentially turns the echo chamber on its head: it is not isolation from opposing views that drives polarization but precisely the fact that digital media bring us to interact outside our local bubble. When individuals interact locally, the outcome is a stable plural patchwork of cross-cutting conflicts. By encouraging nonlocal interaction, digital media drive an alignment of conflicts along partisan lines, thus effacing the counterbalancing effects of local heterogeneity. The result is polarization, even if individual interaction leads to convergence. The model thus suggests that digital media polarize through partisan sorting, creating a maelstrom in which more and more identities, beliefs, and cultural preferences become drawn into an all-encompassing societal division.
Citations
Cited by
- Stitch incoming: political engagement and aggression on TikTok
- How Does Empowering Users with Greater System Control Affect News Filter Bubbles?
- ‘Seen one, seen ‘em all’: political outgroup homogeneity and negative affect
- Auditing YouTube’s recommendation system for ideologically congenial, extreme, and problematic recommendations
- Building Human Values into Recommender Systems: An Interdisciplinary Synthesis
- Cooperative Evolutionary Pressure and Diminishing Returns Might Explain the Fermi Paradox: On What Super-AIs Are Like
- Shifts in U.S. Social Media Use, 2020-2024: Decline, Fragmentation, and Enduring Polarization
- Affective and interactional polarization align across countries
- Elite Political Discourse has Become More Toxic in Western Countries
- Countering the “Climate Cult” – Framing Cascades in Far-Right Digital Networks
- Negative ties highlight hidden extremes in social media polarization
- Platform affordances, discursive opportunities, and social media activism: A cross-platform analysis of #MeToo on Twitter, Facebook, and Reddit, 2017–2020
- Destructive polarization in digital communication contexts: a critical review and conceptual framework
- Algorithmic media use and algorithm literacy: An integrative literature review
- Affective polarization is uniformly distributed across American States
- The relationship between offline partisan geographical segregation and online partisan segregation
- Emergence, Evolution and Manipulation of Swing Voters in Presidential Election
- The epistemic crisis and the rise of the far right: toward a conceptualization of counter-knowledge orders in digital knowledge society
- A review and provocation: On polarization and platforms
- Embracing Dialectic Intersubjectivity: Coordination of Differential Perspectives in Content Analysis With LLM Persona Simulation
- When debates break apart: discursive polarization as a multi-dimensional divergence emerging in and through communication
- What If Moderation Didn't Mean Suppression? A Case for Personalized Content Transformation
- How social media users adopt the toxic behaviors of ingroup and outgroup accounts
- Asymmetric Alliances in Climate Misinformation: A Network Analysis of the Swedish Climate Change Countermovement
- Modeling echo chamber effects in signed networks
- Beyond the median voter: A model of how the ideological dimension shapes party polarization
- Social influence on complex networks as a perturbation to individual behavior
- Burst: Collaborative Curation in Connected Social Media Communities
- Embedding Democratic Values into Social Media AIs via Societal Objective Functions
- When Algorithms Mirror Minds: A Confirmation-Aware Social Dynamic Model of Echo Chamber and Homogenization Traps
- Individual choice, collective effects: recommender systems, law by design, and the DSA’s double choice architecture
- Network segregation and the propagation of misinformation. [europepmc]
- Link updating strategies influence consensus decisions as a function of the direction of communication. [europepmc]
- The Polarizing Impact of Political Disinformation and Hate Speech: A Cross-country Configural Narrative. [europepmc]
- Humans strategically avoid connecting to others who agree and avert the emergence of network polarization in a coordination task. [europepmc]
- Social Drivers and Algorithmic Mechanisms on Digital Media. [europepmc]
- Knowledge through social networks: Accuracy, error, and polarisation. [europepmc]
- Same old story with a different ending: Homophily and preferential selection of information within the US climate policy network. [europepmc]
- Understanding anti-immigration sentiment spreading on Twitter. [europepmc]
- A theoretical framework for polarization as the gradual fragmentation of a divided society. [europepmc]
- Affective polarization is uniformly distributed across American States. [europepmc]
- Navigating the cohesion-diversity trade-off: understanding the role of facilitators in co-creation using agent-based modelling. [europepmc]
- Patterns of partisan toxicity and engagement reveal the common structure of online political communication across countries. [europepmc]
- How social reinforcement learning can lead to metastable polarisation and the voter model. [europepmc]
- Media technology is not the culprit: Factors influencing users' quarrelsome behavior in political social platform use. [europepmc]
- Charting multidimensional ideological polarization across demographic groups in the USA. [europepmc]
- A multilevel network approach to revealing patterns of online political selective exposure. [europepmc]
- Physical partisan proximity outweighs online ties in predicting US voting outcomes. [europepmc]
- Natural language reveals that political partisans are more affectively aligned over political issues than partisan identities. [europepmc]
Discussions
Related