vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Masked Autoencoding Does Not Help Natural Language Supervision at Scale

2023/01/19 by Floris Weers, Vaishaal Shankar, Weers, Floris +7 · 1 citation
Computer Science · Medicine · #Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) #COVID-19 diagnosis using AI #Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) #Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Multimodal Machine Learning Applications

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.07836

openalex publication_date 2023/01/19 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Self supervision and natural language supervision have emerged as two exciting ways to train general purpose image encoders which excel at a variety of downstream tasks. Recent works such as M3AE and SLIP have suggested that these approaches can be effectively combined, but most notably their results use small pre-training datasets (<50M samples) and don't effectively reflect the large-scale regime (>100M examples) that is commonly used for these approaches. Here we investigate whether a similar approach can be effective when trained with a much larger amount of data. We find that a combination of two state of the art approaches: masked auto-encoders, MAE and contrastive language image pre-training, CLIP provides a benefit over CLIP when trained on a corpus of 11.3M image-text pairs, but little to no benefit (as evaluated on a suite of common vision tasks) over CLIP when trained on a large corpus of 1.4B images. Our work provides some much needed clarity into the effectiveness (or lack thereof) of self supervision for large-scale image-text training.

Cited by

Related