Power Hungry Processing: Watts Driving the Cost of AI Deployment?
2023/11/28 by Alexandra Sasha Luccioni, Yacine Jernite, Emma Strubell · 45 voices · 69 citations
Computer Science · #Machine Learning and Data Classification #Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) #Advanced Neural Network Applications
paper · pdf · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658542
Abstract
Recent years have seen a surge in the popularity of commercial AI products based on generative, multi-purpose AI systems promising a unified approach to building machine learning (ML) models into technology. However, this ambition of “generality” comes at a steep cost to the environment, given the amount of energy these systems require and the amount of carbon that they emit. In this work, we propose the first systematic comparison of the ongoing inference cost of various categories of ML systems, covering both task-specific (i.e. finetuned models that carry out a single task) and ‘general-purpose’ models, (i.e. those trained for multiple tasks). We measure deployment cost as the amount of energy and carbon required to perform 1,000 inferences on representative benchmark dataset using these models. We find that multi-purpose, generative architectures are orders of magnitude more expensive than task-specific systems for a variety of tasks, even when controlling for the number of model parameters. We conclude with a discussion around the current trend of deploying multi-purpose generative ML systems, and caution that their utility should be more intentionally weighed against increased costs in terms of energy and emissions. All the data from our study can be accessed via an interactive demo to carry out further exploration and analysis.
Cited by
- A Phased Development Framework Enabling Islanded Operation of Sustainable AI Data Centers With Onsite Grid-Following and Grid-Forming Energy Architectures
- Autonomous VR-Based Risk Detection for Situational Awareness in Dangerous Settings
- A Blueprint for Equilibrium-Based Differentiable Continuous-Variable Thermodynamic Computing
- Attention to Detail: Evaluating Energy, Performance, and Accuracy Trade-offs Across vLLM Configurations
- Not-So-Strange Love: Language Models and Generative Linguistic Theories are More Compatible than They Appear
- The Energy Footprint of LLM-Based Environmental Analysis: LLMs and Domain Products
- Across the Levels of Analysis: Explaining Predictive Processing in Humans Requires More Than Machine-Estimated Probabilities
- The data heat island effect: quantifying the impact of AI data centers in a warming world
- Understanding Efficiency: Quantization, Batching, and Serving Strategies in LLM Energy Use
- Linguists should learn to love speech-based deep learning models
- You can’t fight in here! This is BBS!
- Irresponsible AI: big tech's influence on AI research and associated impacts
- AI, Digital Platforms, and the New Systemic Risk
- Reusing Computation in Text-to-Image Diffusion for Efficient Generation of Image Sets
- More than Carbon: Cradle-to-Grave environmental impacts of GenAI training on the Nvidia A100 GPU
- Anwendungen, Herausforderungen und ein vertrauenswürdiger Umgang mit künstlicher Intelligenz im Bereich Public Health
- Misinformation by Omission: The Need for More Environmental Transparency in AI
- Transfeminist AI Governance
- From Efficiency Gains to Rebound Effects: The Problem of Jevons' Paradox in AI's Polarized Environmental Debate
- How linguistics learned to stop worrying and love the language models
- Alignment Is Not Enough: A Relational Framework for Moral Standing in Human-AI Interaction
- Reconsidering Conversational Norms in LLM Chatbots for Sustainable AI
- Large language models are not about natural language
- From FLOPs to Footprints: The Resource Cost of Artificial Intelligence
- Through the telecom lens: Are all training samples important?
- Large Language Models as Search Engines: Societal Challenges
- Energy Scaling Laws for Diffusion Models: Quantifying Compute and Carbon Emissions in Image Generation
- Can we use LLMs to bootstrap reinforcement learning? -- A case study in digital health behavior change
- Generalist Foundation Models Are Not Clinical Enough for Hospital Operations
- Why Open Small AI Models Matter for Interactive Art
- Smart but Costly? Benchmarking LLMs on Functional Accuracy and Energy Efficiency
- Quantifying the Climate Risk of Generative AI: Region-Aware Carbon Accounting with G-TRACE and the AI Sustainability Pyramid
- Who Evaluates AI's Social Impacts? Mapping Coverage and Gaps in First and Third Party Evaluations
- FREESH: Fair, Resource- and Energy-Efficient Scheduling for LLM Serving on Heterogeneous GPUs
- Analysing Environmental Efficiency in AI for X-Ray Diagnosis
- AI readiness is not enough: Towards purpose-led AI governance in projects
- Considering the ethics of large machine learning models in the chemical sciences
- From Tokens to Watt-hours: Analytical Energy Estimation for LLM Inference on Modern GPUs
- How to Use Generative AI in Educational Research
- Why ‘open’ AI systems are actually closed, and why this matters
- Beyond AI as an environmental pharmakon: Principles for reopening the problem-space of machine learning's carbon footprint
- “Your friendly AI assistant”: the anthropomorphic self-representations of ChatGPT and its implications for imagining AI
- Beyond ChatGPT: a review of the use of AI tools in biological education
- The environmental impact of ICT in the era of data and artificial intelligence
- Decorrelation Speeds Up Vision Transformers
- Evaluating End-User Device Energy Models in Sustainability Reporting of Browser-Based Web Services
- Improving AI Efficiency in Data Centres by Power Dynamic Response
- Small is Sufficient: Reducing the World AI Energy Consumption Through Model Selection
- Exploring the Viability of the Updated World3 Model for Examining the Impact of Computing on Planetary Boundaries
- Advancing Security in Software-Defined Vehicles: A Comprehensive Survey and Taxonomy
- The machine translator’s visibility
- Photonic neural networks at the edge of spatiotemporal chaos in multimode fibers
- Ground-Truthing AI Energy Consumption: Validating CodeCarbon Against External Measurements
- Are Language Models Models?
- Model-based software sustainability analysis and improvement
- Navigating ethical challenges in generative AI-enhanced research: The ETHICAL framework for responsible generative AI use
- Trustworthy AI for Whom? GenAI Detection Techniques of Trust Through Decentralized Web3 Ecosystems
- Harnessing artificial intelligence to fill global shortfalls in biodiversity knowledge
- Co-Creating GenAI-Generated Visualizations of People Living With Dementia: A Participatory Text-To-Image Method and Case-Based Evaluation
- Lift What You Can: Green Online Learning with Heterogeneous Ensembles
- Video Killed the Energy Budget: Characterizing the Latency and Power Regimes of Open Text-to-Video Models
- Large Language Models Imitate Logical Reasoning, but at what Cost?
- Virtual Agent Economies
- Electricity Demand and Grid Impacts of AI Data Centers: Challenges and Prospects
- Memristor-Based Neural Network Accelerators for Space Applications: Enhancing Performance with Temporal Averaging and SIRENs
- Comparing energy consumption and accuracy in text classification inference
- Imposing AI: Deceptive design patterns against sustainability
- Mitigating the Carbon Footprint of Chatbots as Consumers
- Advancing Dialectal Arabic to Modern Standard Arabic Machine Translation
Discussions
- Ok people answered in the comments, thank you! If I am reading the source paper correctly (arxiv.org/pdf/2311.16863) the energy use of generating a single image is equivalent to charging your phone ha [bsky, 26 points, 4 comments]
- ~18 Wh par 1000 req texte (arxiv.org/pdf/2311.16863) et 0,550 l/kWh côté DC + 3,1 l/kWh côté production électrique (source : arxiv.org/abs/2304.03271 des fameux 50 cl). Soit 11 cl + 60 cl par 1000 req [bsky, 8 points, 2 comments]
- Yeah local image generation became available before text for a reason. You just don't need as many parameters to make a JPEG as you do to run a chat bot. arxiv.org/pdf/2311.16863 [bsky, 5 points, 1 comments]
- arxiv.org/pdf/2311.16863
consumerecology.com/beef-carbon-...
www.sierraclub.org/redwood/napa...
www.google.com/travel/fligh... [bsky, 4 points, 0 comments]
- Power Hungry Processing: Watts Driving the Cost of AI Deployment? [lobsters, 4 points, 0 comments]
- Power Hungry Processing
Luccioni, Jernite & Strubell, November 2023
"the most efficient text generation model uses as much energy as 16% of a full smartphone charge for 1,000 inferences, whereas the [bsky, 3 points, 0 comments]
- Afaict the most detailed energy use analysis of generative ML systems
Big variation across tasks, 0.002-2.9 kWh per 1k queries (table 2)
They didn't get at this but the env impact will depend on the [bsky, 3 points, 0 comments]
- Basing it off these (non-peer reviewed yet) estimates arxiv.org/pdf/2311.168... [bsky, 3 points, 1 comments]
- I think in the region of 40ml - 150ml depending on which model they used to generate it. probably on the lower edge since that's, frankly, a pretty simple image. arxiv.org/abs/2311.16863 [bsky, 3 points, 0 comments]
- Large Carbon Footprint Models.
arxiv.org/abs/2311.16863 [bsky, 3 points, 0 comments]
- arxiv.org/pdf/2311.16863 [bsky, 3 points, 0 comments]
- Power Hungry Processing: Watts Driving the Cost of AI Deployment? [hn, 2 points, 0 comments]
- C'est pas vraiment ce qu'on lit ici : générer une image à l’aide d’un puissant modèle d’IA nécessite autant d’énergie que charger complètement son téléphone intelligent, selon une nouvelle étude menée [bsky, 2 points, 2 comments]
- LLMs use 0.047 Whs per query: arxiv.org/pdf/2311.16863
a high end gaming computer can use over 862 Watts per hour with a headroom of 688 Watts. Therefore, each query is about 2 seconds of gaming: www [bsky, 2 points, 2 comments]
- Je suis allé voir l'article que vous citez arxiv.org/pdf/2311.16863 On y trouve ce tableau, qui donne 0.047 Wh pour générer un texte (les valeurs en kWh sont pour 1000 requêtes) et 2,9 pour générer un [bsky, 2 points, 1 comments]
- Så stora utsläpp leder AI-boomen till [lemmy, 2 points, 0 comments]
- Taking all of the morality of stealing the creative works of others out of the picture, there's the fact that generating any content with AI uses a massive amount of energy, and yes, studies have been [bsky, 1 points, 1 comments]
- A lire avant de prompter...une étude validée... arxiv.org/pdf/2311.168... [bsky, 1 points, 0 comments]
- Eilen tuli tekoälyllä kuvia generoivien tekoälyjen energiatehokkuudesta ja hiilijalanjäljestä ihan tutkimus ulos.
arxiv.org/pdf/2311.168... (PDF) [bsky, 1 points, 0 comments]
- The headline figure of the article is based on the pre-2024 EPA definition of a smartphone charge. The study itself now uses the 2024 definition which is twice the pre-2024 number, which is why the st [bsky, 1 points, 0 comments]
- These per-use metrics are interesting but the real damage gets done in the volume of usage, which of course ties into incentives and the general use cases and culture for LLMs, text and image generati [bsky, 1 points, 0 comments]
- That's really interesting! So, according to this paper arxiv.org/pdf/2311.16863, one AI image takes around .12kW to create. I don't know a lot about the processes for genAI artists, but I think you ha [bsky, 1 points, 1 comments]
- I feel like it's worth mentioning.
According to this article (written by people at HuggingFace, so supposedly they know what they are talking about)
Generating a single image (~20 iterations) using di [bsky, 1 points, 2 comments]
- Where do you get that figure? Best figures I've seen say that it's about 3 watt-hours for one image gen: arxiv.org/pdf/2311.16863 [bsky, 1 points, 1 comments]
- Luccioni et al: AI image generation is 60X more energy-intensive than AI text generation. arxiv.org/pdf/2311.16863 [bsky, 1 points, 0 comments]
- (et concernant la conso energetique, une image c'est dans les 3 à 12Wh [ arxiv.org/pdf/2311.16863 ]... vous pourriez en faire 100 que vous seriez loin d'un artiste qui utilise des dizaines d'heures un [bsky, 1 points, 0 comments]
- An article I read made reference to this study. I have to admit I just read the quote & moved on, I didn't read the complete study so I'm not sure how helpful you'll find it. But perhaps getting in to [bsky, 1 points, 1 comments]
- the data i've seen suggests a conclusion that makes sense in the context of other types of waste generation. This paper shows that different types of AI models use different amounts of power, sometime [bsky, 1 points, 1 comments]
- One thing with this story is that the study referenced is quite literally just talking about *using* these models, not training them.
"As stated above, our study focuses on the inference (i.e. deploy [bsky, 1 points, 0 comments]
-
Image generators only use about 2.9 Wh of electricity per image, creating 0.2 grams of CO2: arxiv.org/pdf/2311.16863
A high end gaming computer can use over 862 Watts per hour with a headroom of 688 [bsky, 1 points, 0 comments]
- arxiv.org/pdf/2311.16863 [bsky, 1 points, 0 comments]
- Los requisitos de energía y las emisiones de carbono de diferentes tareas y modelos de aprendizaje automático.
Power Hungry Processing: Watts Driving the Cost of AI Deployment?
arxiv.org/pdf/2311.16 [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- arxiv.org/abs/2311.16863 [bsky, 0 points, 1 comments]
- Just a preprint but fascinating information honestly. 3 kWh to generate an image is huge, although a lot of other tasks are relatively minor. Interesting to see some analyses though, especially with t [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
-
Une étude tente de chiffrer la consommation électrique et le coût énergétique d'un déploiement de plusieurs IA génératives
arxiv.org/pdf/2311.168... [bsky, 0 points, 1 comments]
- Assez incroyable d avoir sur le web le grand n'importe quoi dans les estimations d'impact d'une requête ChatGPT : un facteur entre 500 et 1000 par rapport à l'étude scientifique de @sashamtl.bsky.soci [bsky, 0 points, 1 comments]
- Well. Another research paper's dug into the ecological impact of generative AI, and image generation is... Up there.
But skimming the paper, it also seems like search engines switching to AI is going [bsky, 0 points, 1 comments]
- Power Hungry Processing: Watts Driving the Cost of AI Deployment? arxiv.org/abs/2311.16863 [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- Must read: arxiv.org/pdf/2311.168... [bsky, 0 points, 1 comments]
- Eh, a tope con la idea de fondo: consumo responsable y la hostia. Dicho esto, eso son los números que ha posteado el tipo de Instagram en su propio comentario. El único estudio con un poco de cara y o [bsky, 0 points, 1 comments]
- The paper being referenced in the quoted post being replied to in my quoted post is on the right track by centering LLMs in the discussion of AI energy costs imo. While per-use cost of T2I (& to a les [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- arxiv.org/pdf/2311.16863 [bsky, 0 points, 1 comments]
- Made a drawing. Probably required less than 3kWh of energy, since I didn't even break a sweat. arxiv.org/pdf/2311.16863 cool cool. [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- 🕯 Дослідження про вплив нейронок на довкілля
За допомогою інструменту Code Carbo визначили обсяг викидів CO2.
Генерація 1000 картинок у Stable Diffusion XL = викидам, що створюються при подоланні [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- Post your BlueSky name and bio in ai and see what it makes of it.
Needed a bit of tweaking until it resulted in a portrait. Not bad, but nothing to replace my caricature with 😅
Quick opportunity to [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
Related