How linguistics learned to stop worrying and love the language models
2025/01/28 by Richard Futrell, Kyle Mahowald, Futrell, Richard +1 · 6 voices · 21 citations
Arts and Humanities · #Linguistic Education and Pedagogy
paper · pdf · doi:10.1017/s0140525x2510112x
Abstract
Abstract Language models (LMs) can produce fluent, grammatical text. Nonetheless, some maintain that language models don’t really learn language and also, even if they did, that would not be informative for the study of human learning and processing. On the other side, there have been claims that the success of LMs obviates the need for studying linguistic theory and structure. We argue that both extremes are wrong. LMs can contribute to fundamental questions about linguistic structure, language processing, and learning. They force us to rethink arguments and ways of thinking that have been foundational in linguistics. While they do not replace linguistic structure and theory, they serve as model systems and working proofs of concept for gradient, usage-based approaches to language. We offer an optimistic take on the relationship between language models and linguistics.
Citations
Cited by
Discussions
- LMs need linguistics! New paper, with @futrell.bsky.social, on LMs and linguistics that conveys our excitement about what the present moment means for linguistics and what linguistics can do for LMs. [bsky, 110 points, 3 comments]
- Linguistics Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Language Models [hn, 3 points, 1 comments]
- There's going to be an upcoming issue of behavioral and brain sciences on a paper by @futrell.bsky.social @kmahowald.bsky.social "How Linguistics Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Language Models" [bsky, 2 points, 1 comments]
- This is in response to the recent target article by @futrell.bsky.social & @kmahowald.bsky.social, a wonderful read! Thanks to the authors for writing such a clear and inspiring piece to start this di [bsky, 1 points, 0 comments]
- One finding that speaks to this is whether LLMs learn “impossible” languages as easily as humans. Unfortunately, there has been some confusion about the findings, and the recent BBS paper by Futrell a [bsky, 1 points, 1 comments]
- Now reading: "How Linguistics Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Language Models" to vibe with the spectre that is Chomskian syntax. It did help to get an "optimistic take on the relationship betw [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
Related