What Do We Measure When We Measure Affective Polarization?
2019/01/01 by James Druckman, James N Druckman, Matthew Levendusky +1 · 1 voice · 63 citations
Social Sciences · #Electoral Systems and Political Participation #Social Media and Politics #Social and Cultural Dynamics
paper · doi:10.1093/poq/nfz003
openalex publication_date 2019/01/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/31
Abstract
Affective polarization—the tendency of Democrats and Republicans to dislike and distrust one another—has become an important phenomenon in American politics. Yet, despite scholarly attention to this topic, two measurement lacunae remain. First, how do the different measures of this concept relate to one another—are they interchangeable? Second, these items all ask respondents about the parties. When individuals answer them, do they think of voters, elites, or both? We demonstrate differences across items, and scholars should carefully think about which items best match their particular research question. Second, we show that when answering questions about the other party, individuals think about elites more than voters. More generally, individuals dislike voters from the other party, but they harbor even more animus toward the other party’s elites. The research note concludes by discussing the consequences for both measuring this concept and understanding its ramifications.
Citations
Cited by
- How Affective Polarization Undermines Support for Democratic Norms
- What Do We Measure When We Measure Affective Polarization across Countries?
- The Effects of Polarized Evaluations on Political Participation: Does Hating the Other Side Motivate Voters?
- Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization
- Social Desirability and Affective Polarization
- Affective Polarization towards Parties and Leaders, and Electoral Participation in 13 Parliamentary Democracies, 1980–2019
- An Outbreak of Selective Attribution: Partisanship and Blame in the COVID-19 Pandemic
- The Nature of Affective Polarization: Disentangling Policy Disagreement from Partisan Identity
- Does Affective Polarization Undermine Democratic Norms or Accountability? Maybe Not
- Partisan affect and political tolerance in the context of shifting norms: the effect of coalition signals towards the radical right
- A New Measure of Affective Polarization
- Establishing the construct and predictive validity of brief measures of affective polarization
- ‘Seen one, seen ‘em all’: political outgroup homogeneity and negative affect
- Perspective Getting and Cross-Party Support for Electoral Fairness
- Does affective polarisation increase turnout? Evidence from Germany, The Netherlands and Spain
- Affective polarization within parties
- How language divides: Asymmetries in the differentiating power of opinion discourse
- The affective nature of affective polarization: Evidence from physiological and self‐reported responses to US politicians
- Persistent polarization: The unexpected durability of political animosity around US elections
- Rejection-based choices discourage people from opting out of voting
- Polarisation, identity and affect - conceptualising affective polarisation in multi-party systems
- Belief polarization can be caused by disagreements over source independence: Computational modelling, experimental evidence, and applicability to real-world politics
- An ERP-study on the extent to which partisanship conditions the early processing of politicians’ faces
- Affective polarization is uniformly distributed across American States
- Affective Polarization in Multiparty Systems? Comparing Affective Polarization Towards Voters and Parties in Norway and the United States
- Spiral of Silence: How Neutral Moderation Polarizes Content Creation
- Polarization All the Way Down: How Coverage of Elite and Partisan Polarization Spills Over to Perceptions of the U.S. Mass Public
- Affective polarization and coalition signals
- How algorithmically curated online environments influence users’ political polarization: Results from two experiments with panel data
- Bringing critical social psychology to the study of political polarization
- VRscores: A New Measure and Data Set of Workforce Politics Using Voter Registrations
- The Art of Being Wrong: A Systematic Review and Integrative Model for Promoting Intellectual Humility
- Estimating affective polarization on a social network
- Affective polarization and habits of political participation
- Conceptualizing Affective Climate Polarization
- Megastudy testing 25 treatments to reduce antidemocratic attitudes and partisan animosity
- A New Measure of Affective Polarization
- The Rationality of Affective Polarization
- Does Talking to the Other Side Reduce Inter-party Hostility? Evidence from Three Studies
- Reducing Affective Polarization: Warm Group Relations or Policy Compromise?
- Contingent Confidence: The Effect of the 2024 Election Outcome on Public and Elite Confidence in National Elections
- Attitude networks as intergroup realities: Using network‐modelling to research attitude‐identity relationships in polarized political contexts
- You’re Making Us Look Bad: Can Partisan Embarrassment Dampen Partisanship and Polarization?
- A Waste of Time? Partisan Deliberative Bias as a Barrier to Political Crosstalk
- Micropolarization: performances of antagonism and struggles for recognition during the COVID-19 pandemic
- Determinants of Affective Polarization in Mexico's 2018 Presidential Election
- Political breakups: Interpersonal consequences of polarization
- Empathic Engagement and Polarization in Multi-Party Democracies: The Case of the Populist Radical Right
- How issue opinions relate to individual-level affective polarization: Exploring the psychological mechanisms of affective polarization regarding immigration in a multi-party setting
- When debates break apart: discursive polarization as a multi-dimensional divergence emerging in and through communication
- Identity after the ballot: How winning and losing impact partisan attachments and affective polarization
- The Kids Are Online: Teen Social Media Use, Civic Engagement, and Affective Polarization
- The Impact of Online Political Conflict Frames on Party Evaluations and Trust in Politicians
- The promise and pitfalls of cross-partisan conversations for reducing affective polarization: Evidence from randomized experiments
- Does polarization increase participation? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis
- Can Generative AI Promote Democracy? Countering Polarization with Digital Storytelling
- Affect, Not Ideology: The Heterogeneous Effects of Partisan Cues on Policy Support
- How Do Americans Explain Their Party Identification and Out-Partisan Animosity?
- Partisanship as a Social Identity: Implications for Polarization
- Affective Polarization across European Parliaments
- Synthetic Replacements for Human Survey Data? The Perils of Large Language Models
- Why Do Deliberative Discussions Reduce Affective Polarization? Evidence from a Deliberation Experiment in Honduras
- When like-minded news heals: the depolarizing effect of non-election media on partisans in Taiwan
Discussions
Related