2024/06/20 by Richard T. Liu, Jessica L. Hamilton, Simone Imani Boyd +8 · 14 citations
Medicine · Psychology · #Clinical psychology #Internal medicine #MEDLINE #Medicine #Meta-analysis #Psychological stress #Psychology #Resilience and Mental Health #Systematic review
paper · open access · doi:10.1037/bul0000431
published in Psychological Bulletin 150(9), 1021-1069 (American Psychological Association)
openalex publication_date 2024/06/20 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/06
= 0.36-0.52, BF₁₀ = 946.00 to 4.65 × 10¹⁸). Moderator analyses for dependent stress revealed larger effects for briefer assessments periods, shorter follow-ups, and self-report measures than for interviews. Among risk factors, depressogenic cognitive styles (ds = .26-.50, BF₁₀ = 47.50 to 1.00 × 10⁵) and general interpersonal vulnerability (ds = .26-.44, BF₁₀ = 2.72 to 2708.00) received the strongest support as stress generation mechanisms, and current evidence is modest for protective factors predicting dependent stress. Overall, larger effects were generally found for prospective prediction of dependent stress than independent stress. Evaluations of mediation in the research literature were relatively few, limiting the current review to qualitative analysis of the mediation component of stress generation. General support was found, however, for dependent stress as a mediator for psychopathology and associated risk factors in relation to subsequent psychopathology. The current review ends with recommendations for future research and integration of stress generation within minority stress frameworks. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).