Testing the ‘Party Matters' Thesis: Explaining Progress Towards Kyoto Protocol Targets

2010/07/13 by Christian B. Jensen, Christian Jensen, Jae-Jae Spoon +1 · 6 citations
Social Sciences · Business, Management and Accounting · #Electoral Systems and Political Participation #Political Influence and Corporate Strategies #Social Media and Politics

paper · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00852.x

Abstract

There is growing interest in whether and how parties matter. We add to this discussion by exploring the ways in which parties matter for policy outcomes. To do this, we look at the European Union (EU) member states' progress towards the greenhouse gas emissions targets set for them by the Kyoto Protocol and the EU's Burden Sharing Agreement. We find that governments that are more pro-environment and less ideologically divided make better progress towards their targets. We also demonstrate that green party representation in government predicts convergence. This article contributes to research examining the ways in which parties matter as well as the growing literature on coalition politics and veto players.

Citations

• What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data
• The Limits of Delegation: Veto Players, Central Bank Independence, and the Credibility of Monetary Policy
• Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games

Cited by

• Do Parties Matter for Environmental Policy Stringency? Exploring the Program-to-Policy Link for Environmental Issues in 28 Countries 1990–2015
• Everywhere you vote, you always take the weather with you: the effects of local temperature anomalies on Green party voting
• Party competition on climate policy: The roles of interest groups, ideology and challenger parties in the UK and Ireland
• Inside the federal machine: explaining sub-federal roles in implementing international agreements
• No green country for centralist parties? How parties’ territorial positions influence the salience of environmental issues
• Environmental attitudes, environmental problems and party choice. A large-N comparative study

Related

• Do Parties Matter for Environmental Policy Stringency? Exploring the Program-to-Policy Link for Environmental Issues in 28 Countries 1990–2015
• Party competition on climate policy: The roles of interest groups, ideology and challenger parties in the UK and Ireland
• Between goals and means: the electoral consequences of parties’ climate proposals
• Mainstream parties and climate policy development: what role for intra-party politics?
• Another sleeping giant? Environmental issue preferences in the 2019 European Parliament elections