2024/04/02 by Jiawei Fu, Tara Slough, Fu, Jiawei +1 · 1 voice
Economics, Econometrics and Finance · Mathematics · #Econometrics (econ.EM) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #FOS: Economics and business #Methodology (stat.ME)
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.01566
The credibility revolution advances the use of research designs that permit identification and estimation of causal effects. However, understanding which mechanisms produce measured causal effects remains a challenge. The dominant current approach to the quantitative evaluation of mechanisms relies on the detection of heterogeneous treatment effects (HTEs) with respect to pre-treatment covariates. This paper develops a framework to understand when the existence of such heterogeneous treatment effects can support inferences about the activation of a mechanism. We show first that this design cannot provide evidence of mechanism activation without additional, generally implicit, exclusion assumptions. Further, even when these assumptions are satisfied, the presence of HTEs supports the inference that mechanism is active but the absence of HTEs is generally uninformative about mechanism activation. We provide novel guidance for interpretation and research design in light of these findings.