Evaluating the Big Five as an organizing framework for commonly used psychological trait scales.

2022/01/13 by Timothy F. Bainbridge, Steven G. Ludeke, Luke D. Smillie · 9 citations
Psychology · #Personality Traits and Psychology #Cognitive Abilities and Testing #Emotional Intelligence and Performance

paper · doi:10.1037/pspp0000395

Abstract

= 1,039). Study 1 revealed that 83% of an author-identified collection of scales (e.g., Self-Esteem, Grit, etc.) were as related to the Big Five as at least four of 30 Big Five facets, and Study 2 found that 71% of scales selected based on citation counts passed the same criterion. Several scales had strikingly large links at the Big Five facet level, registering correlations with individual Big Five facets exceeding .9. We conclude that the Big Five can indeed serve as an organizing framework for a sizable majority of stand-alone psychological trait scales and that many of these scales could reasonably be labeled as facets of the Big Five. We suggest an integrative pluralism approach, where reliable, valid scales are located within the Big Five and pertinent Big Five research is considered in all research using trait scales readily located within the Big Five. By adopting such an approach, construct proliferation may be abated and it would become easier to integrate findings from disparate fields. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Citations

• Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being.
• The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things
• Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals.
• On Energy, Personality, and Health: Subjective Vitality as a Dynamic Reflection of Well‐Being
• The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being.
• High Self‐Control Predicts Good Adjustment, Less Pathology, Better Grades, and Interpersonal Success
• Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being.
• Generalizability in Factorable Domains: "Domain Validity and Generalizability"1
• Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions
• The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power.
• Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature.
• The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography.
• The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope.
• Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.

Cited by

• Assessing personality using zero-shot generative AI scoring of brief open-ended text
• Re‐Envisioning a Hierarchy of Leadership Behaviours Using Insights from the Psychological Literature on Personality Traits
• Causal inference for psychologists who think that causal inference is not for them
• How Individual Differences in Empathy Predict Moments of Empathy in Everyday Life
• Personality is (so much) more than just self-reported Big Five traits
• A Nomological Approach to Structuring Personality Characteristics and Their Measures: Grouping Big Five Facets by Similarities in Their Nomological Networks
• Do you mind a closer look? A jingle-jangle fallacy perspective on mindfulness
• Bridges over troubled water: A meta-analysis of the associations of character strengths with well-being and common mental health disorders
• Active vs. passive bystander reactions to online political hostility: the role of personality in counterspeech and silencing among German facebook users

Related

• Why the Big Five personality traits are composites, not common causes: Implications for measurement, prediction, and causal inference.
• Are the metatraits fact or artifact? Ruling out alternative explanations for the higher-order factors of the Big Five.
• A Short Scale for Assessing the Big Five Dimensions of Personality: 10 Item Big Five Inventory (BFI-10)
• Development of a short form of the Japanese Big-Five Scale, and a test of its reliability and validity
• The factor structure of Big Five personality trait measures at the between- and within-person levels