2018/08/20 by Rosaria Franco · 2 citations
Arts and Humanities · Economics, Econometrics and Finance · Social Sciences · #Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes #Historical Economic and Social Studies #Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
paper · doi:10.1177/0022009418785684
In the twentieth century Hong Kong’s population expanded dramatically. Yet, it was only after one million refugees from China settled in the 1950s that the colonial Government undertook population control. Imposing immigration restrictions was straightforward, but curbing unprecedented natural growth proved problematic. On the one side, supporting family planning risked alienating pro-life Catholic organizations, many channelling necessary relief for the refugees in an anti-communist mission for the USA. While on the other, indigenous infant welfare, which reduced infant mortality, could not be neglected further, in part because of the postwar resetting of race relations, its importance in improving public health, and the attention given to the refugee crisis by world public opinion. Hence, the paradox of an overpopulated British colony investing in infant welfare, not in family planning.