2018/02/05 by Suzanne Doyle · 1 citation
Social Sciences · Physics and Astronomy · #Nuclear Issues and Defense #International Relations and Foreign Policy #Space exploration and regulation #Trident #Arms control #Nuclear weapon #Political science #Treaty #Negotiation #Superpower #Element (criminal law) #International trade #Politics #Order (exchange) #Law #History #Business #Archaeology
paper · doi:10.1080/07075332.2018.1430047
published in The International History Review 40(5), 1174-1190 (Routledge)
openalex publication_date 2018/02/05 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
The Trident negotiations were a pivotal moment in establishing the US–UK nuclear relationship as an accepted element of the global nuclear order. The Trident agreements marked the first supply of a US delivery system to the UK since the signing of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and the development of Superpower arms control. In turn, the development of these agendas in the international sphere influenced Anglo-American discussions on the replacement to Polaris. The Carter White House procrastinated on the provision of Trident due in part to their concerns over the political ramifications for their wider non-proliferation and arms control goals. However, fortuitously for the UK's nuclear programme, US–UK discussions on the replacement to Polaris coalesced with the reorientation of US foreign policy towards containment of the Soviet Union under Jimmy Carter and then Ronald Reagan – enabling the finalisation of the sale of Trident to the UK. As such, the status of the US–UK nuclear relationship as a broadly accepted element of the global nuclear order is a legacy of the ‘long 1970s’ alongside the early Cold War.