2010/05/01 by Jim Glassman · 54 citations
Social Sciences · #Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies #Vietnamese History and Culture Studies #Asian Studies and History #Urbanity #Politics #Middle class #Democracy #Royalist #Social class #State (computer science) #Political economy #Sociology #Liberalism #Economic growth #Political science #Development economics #Economy #Economics #Law
paper · doi:10.1177/0042098010362808
published in Urban Studies 47(6), 1301-1323 (SAGE Publishing)
openalex publication_date 2010/05/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/02
Urban social movements are often associated with what are considered ‘progressive’ causes and most activists involved in such movements are inclined to describe themselves in such terms. The Thai coup of September 2006 poses problems for any such easy identification. Although executed by the military, on behalf of royalist interests, the coup was supported by an array of primarily Bangkok-based and middle-class groups, many of them associated with organisations such as NGOs and state enterprise unions. Although some of these groups claimed anti-neo-liberal political orientations, their support for the coup effectively placed them on the side of forces opposed to quasi-Keynesian policies and in favour of specific forms of neo-liberalism—at least for Thai villagers. This paper explores this development by focusing on the Bangkok/upcountry and urban/rural divisions in Thai politics, which, although socially constructed, have taken on political substance, in part because of their grounding in regionally differentiated class structures.