2007/11/16 by Thongchai Winichakul · 4 citations
Social Sciences · #Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies #Vietnamese History and Culture Studies #Cambodian History and Society #Political science #Democracy #Law #Politics
paper · doi:10.1080/00472330701651937
openalex publication_date 2007/11/16 · openalex created_date 2022/05/12 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
Thailand's 2006 royalist coup is best understood by reference to the historical context of democratisation. The dominant historiography of Thai democratisation is either a simplistic liberal view of anti-military democracy or a royalist one that is ultimately anti-democratic. This article offers a serial history of democratisation that allows us to see the long duration of layered historical processes. As democratisation is fundamentally a break from the centralised absolute monarchy, the monarchy and the monarchists, despite their up and down political fortunes, have probably played the most significant role in shaping Thai democracy since 1932. Despite that, their role and place in history has been overlooked due to the perception that they are “above politics.” This article argues that, since 1973 in particular, the monarchists have assumed the status of the superior realm in Thai politics that claims the high moral ground above politicians and normal politics. With distaste for electoral politics, and in tacit collaboration with the so-called people's sector, activists and intellectuals, they have undermined electoral democracy in the name of “clean politics” versus the corruption of politicians. The 2006 coup that toppled democracy was the latest effort of the monarchists to take control of the democratisation process.