2013/01/28 by Neil Malhotra, Yotam Margalit, Cecilia Hyunjung Mo · 471 citations
Social Sciences · #Migration and Labor Dynamics #Migration, Refugees, and Integration #Social and Intergroup Psychology #Immigration #Opposition (politics) #Demographic economics #Competition (biology) #Market competition #Variation (astronomy) #Economics #Political science #Politics #Market economy #Law
paper · doi:10.1111/ajps.12012
published in American Journal of Political Science 57(2), 391-410 (Wiley)
openalex publication_date 2013/01/28 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/25
What explains variation in individuals’ opposition to immigration? While scholars have consistently shown cultural concerns to be strong predictors of opposition, findings regarding the labor‐market competition hypothesis are highly contested. To help understand these divergent results, we distinguish between the prevalence and conditional impact of determinants of immigration attitudes. Leveraging a targeted sampling strategy of high‐technology counties, we conduct a study of Americans’ attitudes toward H‐1B visas. The plurality of these visas are occupied by Indian immigrants, who are skilled but ethnically distinct, enabling us to measure a specific skill set (high technology) that is threatened by a particular type of immigrant (H‐1B visa holders). Unlike recent aggregate studies, our targeted approach reveals that the conditional impact of the relationship in the high‐technology sector between economic threat and immigration attitudes is sizable. However, labor‐market competition is not a prevalent source of threat and therefore is generally not detected in aggregate analyses.