vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Prehistory by Bayesian phylogenetics? The state of the art on Indo-European origins

2014/06/01 by Paul Heggarty · 2 citations
Earth and Planetary Sciences · Social Sciences · #Archaeology #Archaeology and ancient environmental studies #Argument (complex analysis) #Artificial intelligence #Bayesian probability #Biology #Computer science #Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation #Feature (linguistics) #Geography #History #Language and cultural evolution #Linguistics #Philosophy #Prehistory #Steppe

paper · doi:10.1017/s0003598x00101188

openalex publication_date 2014/06/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/22

Abstract

Bayesian analysis has come to be widely used in archaeological chronologies and has been a regular feature of recent articles in Antiquity . Its application to linguistic prehistory, however, has proved controversial, in particular on the issue of Indo-European origins. Dating and mapping language distributions back into prehistory has an inevitable fascination, but has remained fraught with difficulty. This review of recent studies highlights the potential of increasingly sophisticated Bayesian phylogenetic models, while also identifying areas of concern, and ways in which the models might be refined to address them. Notwithstanding these remaining limitations, in the Indo-European case the results from Bayesian phylogenetics continue to reinforce the argument for an Anatolian rather than a Steppe origin.

Citations

Cited by

Related