vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Co-expression of estrogen receptor α and Apolipoprotein D in node positive operable breast cancer – possible relevance for survival and effects of adjuvant tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients

2009/01/01 by Håvard Søiland, Ivar Skaland, Jan Erik Varhaug +5 · 2 citations
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology · Medicine · #Estrogen and related hormone effects #Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism #Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response #Medicine #Breast cancer #Internal medicine #Oncology #Estrogen receptor #Tamoxifen #Immunohistochemistry #Hazard ratio #Cancer #Estrogen

paper · pdf · doi:10.1080/02841860802620613

openalex publication_date 2009/01/01 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Estrogen receptor-alpha (ERalpha) is an important prognostic and predictive marker in breast cancer. ERalpha signaling normally down-regulates expression of Apolipoprotein D (ApoD), a lipocalin that binds, transports or chelates lipophilic ligands, including tamoxifen (TAM). Hence, the co-expression of ApoD may therefore identify clinical relevant subgroups of ERalpha positive breast cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: ApoD, ERalpha, and progesterone receptor (PR) protein expressions were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in primary tumors of 290 patients with operable breast cancer. The median follow-up was 12 years. Patients were stratified according to age, nodal stage and the expression of ERalpha and the combined cytoplasm and nuclear staining of ApoD (ApoD(CN)). RESULTS: In elderly women (> or =70 years) (n = 76), ApoD(CN) expression identified different prognostic subgroups in ERalpha positive patients (Trend: p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis in this age group (n = 72), showed that the ERalpha-positive /ApoD(CN)-negative subgroup had a better breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) compared with the ERalpha-positive/ApoD(CN)-positive group (hazard ratio (HR) = 4.3; 95% CI = 1.6-11.9; p = 0.005). This difference was predominantly seen in the node positive patients (n = 30) (HR = 10.5; 95% CI = 2.3-47.6; p = 0.002). In a subset of postmenopausal ERalpha-positive/node positive patients (n = 60) previously enrolled in a trial on 2 year adjuvant TAM 20 mg vs. placebo, a better BCSS was observed in ApoD(CN) negative patients compared to placebo (p = 0.02). In ApoD(CN) positive patients, adjuvant TAM did not provide any survival benefit. DISCUSSION: ERalpha and ApoD(CN) co-expression seems to be of prognostic importance in node positive elderly patients with operable breast cancer. In addition, we hypothesize that ApoD(CN) expression may be a novel marker and/or mechanism of TAM resistance in postmenopausal node positive patients. Thus, when targeting the ERalpha pathway in these patients, the ApoD status of the tumor may be of clinical relevance.

Citations

Cited by

Related