Moral Foundations Theory

2013/01/01 by Jesse Graham, Jonathan Haidt, Sena Koleva +5 · 5 citations
Mathematics · Neuroscience · Psychology · Social Sciences · #Conceptualization #Cultural Differences and Values #Epistemology #Foundation (evidence) #Law #Mathematics #Moral development #Moral disengagement #Moral psychology #Morality #Philosophy #Political science #Psychology #Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment #Social and Intergroup Psychology #Social cognitive theory of morality #Social psychology #Sociology #Variety (cybernetics)

paper · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4

crossref issued 2013/01/01 · crossref published 2013/01/01 · crossref published-print 2013/01/01 · openalex publication_date 2013/01/01 · crossref created 2013/04/08 · crossref deposited 2019/07/12 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/04 · crossref indexed 2026/08/04

Citations

• Do cultural values predict individuals' moral attitudes? A cross‐cultural multilevel approach
• An argument for basic emotions
• What Do We Know When We Know a Person?
• Political Attitudes Vary with Physiological Traits
• The Behavioral Immune System (and Why It Matters)
• The “Black Sheep Effect”: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification
• Object permanence in 3½- and 4½-month-old infants.
• Understanding Libertarian Morality: The Psychological Dispositions of Self-Identified Libertarians
• A mutualistic approach to morality: The evolution of fairness by partner choice
• Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis.
• The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme
• A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality.
• The weirdest people in the world?
• Moral Cognition: Explaining the Gender Difference in Antisocial Behavior
• Mapping the moral domain.
• Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory
• Intuitive ethics: how innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues
• Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
• Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five.
• The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
• The unbearable automaticity of being.
• Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment
• Three Laws of Behavior Genetics and What They Mean
• The case for motivated reasoning.
• Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases
• Compassionate Liberals and Polite Conservatives: Associations of Agreeableness With Political Ideology and Moral Values
• Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
• The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology
• The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
• When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize
• Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
• The Moral Stereotypes of Liberals and Conservatives: Exaggeration of Differences across the Political Spectrum
• In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development.
• The Origins and Meaning of Liberal/Conservative Self-Identifications
• The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II
• Evidence for terror management theory: I. The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who violate or uphold cultural values.

Cited by

• Morality in everyday life
• Measuring Moral Rhetoric in Text
• Moralized Rationality: Relying on Logic and Evidence in the Formation and Evaluation of Belief Can Be Seen as a Moral Issue
• Ideological measurement in social and political psychology
• Moral psychology [wikipedia]