2007/05/18 by Jonathan Haidt · 11 citations
Neuroscience · Psychology · #Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment #Cultural Differences and Values #Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion #Morality #Harm #Loyalty #Moral disengagement #Social cognitive theory of morality #Moral psychology #Social psychology #Epistemology #Sociology #Moral development #Environmental ethics #Moral authority #Moral reasoning #Psychology #Law #Political science #Philosophy
paper · doi:10.1126/science.1137651
openalex publication_date 2007/05/18 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/31
People are selfish, yet morally motivated. Morality is universal, yet culturally variable. Such apparent contradictions are dissolving as research from many disciplines converges on a few shared principles, including the importance of moral intuitions, the socially functional (rather than truth-seeking) nature of moral thinking, and the coevolution of moral minds with cultural practices and institutions that create diverse moral communities. I propose a fourth principle to guide future research: Morality is about more than harm and fairness. More research is needed on the collective and religious parts of the moral domain, such as loyalty, authority, and spiritual purity.