vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Turning Bias into Bugs: Bandit-Guided Style Manipulation Attacks on LLM Judges

2026/05/24 by Xianglin Yang, Bryan Hooi, Gelei Deng +2 · 1 voice
Computer Science · #cs.AI #cs.CR #cs.LG

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.26156

arxiv published 2026/05/24 · arxiv updated 2026/05/28

Abstract

The known stylistic biases in LLM judges, such as a preference for verbosity or specific sentence structures, present an underexplored security vulnerability. In this work, we introduce BITE (BIas exploraTion and Exploitation), a black-box adversarial framework that learns semantics-preserving edits to mislead an LLM judge and artificially inflate the scores it assigns. We cast the selection of stylistic edits as a contextual bandit problem and use a LinUCB policy to adaptively choose edits that maximize the judge's score without access to model parameters or gradients. Empirically, we test BITE across a diverse range of LLM judges and tasks, including both pointwise and pairwise comparisons on chatbot leaderboards and AI-reviewer benchmarks. BITE achieves an attack success rate exceeding 65% and raises scores by 1-2 points on a 9-point scale, all while preserving semantic equivalence. We further assess the attack's stealthiness, showing that BITE evades standard style-control methods and several detection baselines. Our findings expose a fundamental weakness in the LLM-as-a-judge paradigm and motivate robust, attack-aware evaluation. Our code is available at https://github.com/xianglinyang/llm-as-a-judge-attack.

Citations

Discussions

Related