CURE-like, not cure-all: Varying broad relevance in experimentation labs produces similar student outcomes
2026/05/30 by Elly Markert, Mike Verostek, Matthew Dew +6 · 1 voice
Physics and Astronomy · #physics.ed-ph
paper · pdf
Abstract
Physics labs that engage students in practices authentic to experimental physics (experimentation-based labs) are being implemented to modernize the undergraduate physics curriculum and broaden participation in physics. Accordingly, prior research has positioned Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs) as a means to extend the benefits of authentic undergraduate research experiences to more students. However, CUREs are resource-intensive and difficult to implement; a continuous stream of novel research projects adaptable for undergraduate courses is rare. Further, little is known about which specific components of a CURE are crucial to improving student outcomes and which components could be scaled back to improve feasibility for a wider range of class settings. In this study, we aim to isolate the component of broad relevance by running two experimentation-based labs in parallel: one "CURE-like" that increases broad relevance through the use of muon detectors, and one that uses equipment typical to an introductory physics lab and not relevant beyond the classroom. We measure student outcomes for both experimental critical thinking skills and attitudes towards physics labs. We use hierarchical linear modeling to compare student outcomes between the two labs. We find that both experimentation-based labs produce similar student outcomes. Our results suggest that increased levels of broad relevance may not inherently improve gains in student learning or attitudes. Future work should further investigate which components of different experimentation-based lab formats are associated with gains in student outcomes. Although this study did not implement a full CURE, our findings align with a growing body of evidence challenging the idea that CUREs are uniquely positioned to achieve superior student outcomes over other well-designed experimentation-based labs.
Citations
- Experimental Skills for Undergraduate Career Preparation in Quantum Information Science and Engineering
- Share, Rotate, Split: The Effects of Group Work Role Distributions on Student Outcomes
- A Scoping Review of Published Lesson Plans Showcases Two Decades of Change in Undergraduate Life Science Education Resources
- Relative benefits of different active learning methods to conceptual physics learning
- Group Dynamics in Inquiry-based Labs: Gender Inequities and the Efficacy of Partner Agreements
- Quantifying critical thinking: Development and validation of the Physics Lab Inventory of Critical thinking (PLIC)
- Missing data and bias in physics education research: A case for using multiple imputation
- Operationalizing the AAPT Learning Goals for the Lab
- Assessment of critical thinking in physics labs
- Modernizing use of regression models in physics education research: a review of hierarchical linear modeling
- Equity in College Physics Student Learning: a Critical Quantitative Intersectionality Investigation
- The CosmicWatch Desktop Muon Detector: a self-contained, pocket sized particle detector
- Developing skills versus reinforcing concepts in physics labs: Insight from a survey of students’ beliefs about experimental physics
- Examining and contrasting the cognitive activities engaged in undergraduate research experiences and lab courses
- Model-Based Reasoning in the Upper-Division Physics Laboratory: Framework and Initial Results
- Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models using lme4
- Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
- Assessment of Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences: A Meeting Report
- Making a Difference in Science Education
- Incorporating learning goals about modeling into an upper-division physics laboratory experiment
- mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations inR
- Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice
- Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study
- We Be Burnin'!Agency, Identity, and Science Learning
- Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens
- Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students' cognitive, personal, and professional development
Discussions
- Markert, Verostek, Dew, Chen, Lory-Moran, Padavan, Walia, Wittich, Holmes: CURE-like, not cure-all: Varying broad relevance in experimentation labs produces similar student outcomes https://arxiv.org/ [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
Related