2019/10/07 by Daan Jacobs, Wesley Kaufmann · 1 citation
Social Sciences · #Social Media and Politics #Public Policy and Administration Research #Law in Society and Culture #Legitimacy #Democratic legitimacy #Publics #Deliberative democracy #Political science #Process (computing) #Democracy #Public participation #Public relations #Deliberation #Selection (genetic algorithm) #Public administration #Public opinion #Law #Politics #Computer science
paper · pdf · doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1668468
openalex publication_date 2019/10/07 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
Deliberative mini-publics have been put forward as a form of citizen participation that is particularly well suited to improve the legitimacy of public decision-making. Using a survey experiment, we find that the perceived legitimacy of a process that includes a deliberative mini-public is higher than a process in which citizens are not able to participate at all, but no higher than a process that includes a participation method that relies on self-selection. Our findings imply that deliberative mini-publics may not be the right instrument to repair the loss of legitimacy that many democratic institutions are thought to suffer.