2012/09/30 by Matthew Hughes · 1 citation
Social Sciences · #Military History and Strategy #Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East #Military, Security, and Education Studies #Insurgency #Colonialism #State (computer science) #Use of force #Security forces #Political economy #Law #Political science #Criminology #Sociology #Politics #International law
paper · doi:10.1080/09592318.2012.709771
openalex publication_date 2012/09/30 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
This essay introduces the special issue, drawing together the different studies around the central theme of the nature of the force used by Britain against colonial insurgents. It argues that the violence employed by British security forces in counter-insurgency to maintain imperial rule is best seen from a maximal perspective, contra traditional arguments that the British used minimum force to defeat colonial rebellions. It shows that the use of force became more difficult especially after the Amritsar massacre in 1919. The presence of white settlers in counter-insurgencies – such as in Kenya in the 1950s – accelerated abuse by security forces and complicated the measured use of force against insurgents by the colonial state. The article concludes by drawing lessons from the British experience of counter-insurgency to unconventional military operations today, suggesting that in some situations the use of maximal force is still an option in counter-insurgency.