2011/11/08 by Caroline Elkins · 1 citation
Social Sciences · Arts and Humanities · #Vietnamese History and Culture Studies #Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics #Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis #Law #Colonialism #Economic Justice #Torture #Context (archaeology) #Sociology #History #Political science #Human rights
paper · doi:10.1080/03086534.2011.629084
openalex publication_date 2011/11/08 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
Restorative justice in various forms is a phenomenon that has swept across the globe over the last three decades. Most recently, it is unfolding in the High Court of Justice in London where five Kenyans have filed a claim against the British government, alleging that they suffered acts of mistreatment and torture at the hands of British colonial and military personnel. Three revisionist Mau Mau historians have served as advisors and expert witnesses for the claimants. Judicial procedure and the positivist stance of the court have framed their production of evidence and its reading. This article will examine the production of the historians’ witness statements, and the impact that the recent Hanslope Disclosure has had upon their work. The discussion is framed within the broader context of Mau Mau revisionism and the critiques that ensued after the publication of Imperial Reckoning and Histories of the Hanged.