vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Mau Mau in the High Court and the ‘Lost’ British Empire Archives: Colonial Conspiracy or Bureaucratic Bungle?

2011/11/08 by David Anderson, David M. Anderson · 4 citations
Arts and Humanities · Social Sciences · #African history and culture studies #Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics #Military History and Strategy

paper · doi:10.1080/03086534.2011.629082

openalex publication_date 2011/11/08 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29

Abstract

In April 2011, a landmark hearing before the High Court in London found that the British government had a case to answer concerning abuse and torture allegedly carried out by British officials in Kenya during the Mau Mau counter-insurgency. Prior to the hearing, it was revealed that the British government had removed some 1,500 ‘sensitive’ government files from Kenya at independence, many of these relating to alleged abuses carried our during the Emergency of the 1950s. This discovery then led directly to the revelation of a further tranche of 8,800 historical files relating to the decolonisation of 36 other former British colonies. This article explains the nature of the claims of torture and abuse made in the Kenya case in the High Court, and then describes the new evidence in the recently disclosed documents. The concluding section then discusses the Kenya case and the implications of the larger discovery of the ‘lost’ British Empire archive.

Cited by