2007/05/18 by Jonathan Haidt · 2,416 citations
Neuroscience · Psychology · #Cultural Differences and Values #Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion #Environmental ethics #Epistemology #Harm #Law #Loyalty #Moral authority #Moral development #Moral disengagement #Moral psychology #Moral reasoning #Morality #Philosophy #Political science #Psychology #Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment #Social cognitive theory of morality #Social psychology #Sociology
paper · doi:10.1126/science.1137651
published in Science 316(5827), 998-1002 (American Association for the Advancement of Science)
openalex publication_date 2007/05/18 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/31
People are selfish, yet morally motivated. Morality is universal, yet culturally variable. Such apparent contradictions are dissolving as research from many disciplines converges on a few shared principles, including the importance of moral intuitions, the socially functional (rather than truth-seeking) nature of moral thinking, and the coevolution of moral minds with cultural practices and institutions that create diverse moral communities. I propose a fourth principle to guide future research: Morality is about more than harm and fairness. More research is needed on the collective and religious parts of the moral domain, such as loyalty, authority, and spiritual purity.