Prediction of students' argumentation skills about controversial topics by epistemological understanding

2006/10/01 by Lucia Mason, Lucia Masón, Fabio Scirica · 153 citations
Psychology · Social Sciences · #Argument (complex analysis) #Argumentation theory #Education and Critical Thinking Development #Educational Strategies and Epistemologies #Epistemology #Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods #Linguistics #Philosophy #Political science #Psychology #Reading (process) #Rebuttal

paper · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.09.007

published in Learning and Instruction 16(5), 492-509 (Elsevier BV)

crossref issued 2006/10/01 · crossref published 2006/10/01 · crossref published-print 2006/10/01 · openalex publication_date 2006/10/01 · crossref created 2006/10/18 · crossref deposited 2019/01/12 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · crossref indexed 2026/04/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/23

Citations

• Individual differences in rational thought.
• Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics
• Missing the point or missing the norms? Epistemological norms as predictors of students’ ability to identify fallacious arguments
• A Developmental Model of Critical Thinking
• Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking
• The Development of Epistemological Theories: Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing and Their Relation to Learning

Cited by

• Confirmation bias [wikipedia]