2008/10/23 by Martin Frické · 1 citation
Decision Sciences · Computer Science · Social Sciences · #Knowledge Management and Technology #Information Architecture and Usability #Information Systems Theories and Implementation
paper · doi:10.1177/0165551508094050
openalex publication_date 2008/10/23 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/15
The paper evaluates the data—information—knowledge—wisdom (DIKW) hierarchy. This hierarchy, also known as the `knowledge hierarchy', is part of the canon of information science and management. Arguments are offered that the hierarchy is unsound and methodologically undesirable. The paper identifies a central logical error that DIKW makes. The paper also identifies the dated and unsatisfactory philosophical positions of operationalism and inductivism as the philosophical backdrop to the hierarchy. The paper concludes with a sketch of some positive theories, of value to information science, on the nature of the components of the hierarchy: that data is anything recordable in a semantically and pragmatically sound way, that information is what is known in other literature as `weak knowledge', that knowledge also is `weak knowledge' and that wisdom is the possession and use, if required, of wide practical knowledge, by an agent who appreciates the fallible nature of that knowledge.