vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Chronological Contexts of the Earliest Pottery Neolithic in the South Caucasus: Radiocarbon Dates for Göytepe and Hacı Elamxanlı Tepe, Azerbaijan

2015/06/17 by Yoshihiro Nishiaki, Farhad Guliyev, Seiji Kadowaki · 4 citations
Arts and Humanities · Earth and Planetary Sciences · #Agriculture #Ancient history #Archaeology #Archaeology and ancient environmental studies #Cartography #Chronology #Foothills #Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies #Geography #History #Human settlement #Paleopathology and ancient diseases #Pottery #Radiocarbon dating

paper · doi:10.3764/aja.119.3.0279

openalex publication_date 2015/06/17 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/09

Abstract

Research on the earliest Neolithic in the South Caucasus is still in its early stages. Establishing a solid chronological framework will help determine the timing of the emergence and subsequent development of regional Neolithic societies. This article reports on 46 radiocarbon dates obtained from the two recently excavated Early Pottery Neolithic sites of Göytepe and Hacı Elamxanlı Tepe, the oldest farming villages known to date in West Azerbaijan. Comparing the dates from other related sites demonstrates that several settlements representing the earliest Pottery Neolithic emerged almost simultaneously at the beginning of the sixth millennium B.C.E. in the northern and southern foothills of the Lesser Caucasus Mountains. The lack of evidence for plant cultivation or animal husbandry at earlier sites suggests a foreign origin for agricultural economies in the South Caucasus. However, cultural items characterizing the initial agropastoral communities were not brought to the region as a package. Instead, we suggest that these early farming communities—that is, the Shomutepe-Shulaveri—underwent gradual but significant autochthonous developments likely deriving from the aceramic stage. The chronological framework provided by Göytepe and Hacı Elamxanlı Tepe serves as a reference point for identifying details of early farmers’ cultural developments in the South Caucasus. A free, downloadable appendix can be found under this article’s abstract on AJA Online.

Citations

Cited by

Related