Where Do Your Citations Come From? Citation-Constellation: A Free, Open-Source, No-Code, and Auditable Tool for Citation Network Decomposition with Complementary BARON and HEROCON Scores

2026/03/25 by Mahbub Ul Alam · 1 voice
Computer Science · #cs.AI #cs.DB #cs.DL #cs.IR

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.24216

Abstract

Standard citation metrics treat all citations as equal, obscuring the social and structural pathways through which scholarly influence propagates. I introduce Citation-Constellation, a freely available no-code tool for citation network analysis with two complementary bibliometric scores that decompose a researcher's citation profile by network proximity between citing and cited authors. BARON (Boundary-Anchored Research Outreach Network score) is a strict binary metric counting only citations from outside the detected collaborative network. HEROCON (Holistic Equilibrated Research Outreach CONstellation score) applies graduated weights assigning partial credit to in-group citations based on relationship proximity. The gap between scores serves as a diagnostic of inner-circle dependence. An extended abstract with full details appears in the paper. The tool implements this through a phased architecture: (1) self-citation analysis, (2) co-authorship graph traversal, (3) temporal institutional affiliation matching via ROR, and (4) AI-agent-driven venue governance extraction using a local LLM. Phases 1-3 are fully operational; Phase 4 is under development. Key design choices include ORCID-validated author identity resolution, an UNKNOWN classification for citations with insufficient metadata, and comprehensive audit trails documenting every classification decision. A no-code web interface enables researchers to compute scores without programming, installation, or registration. I present these scores as structural diagnostics, not quality indicators. BARON and HEROCON describe where in the social graph citations originate. They should not be used for hiring, promotion, or funding decisions. HEROCON weights are experimental and require empirical calibration.

Citations

• Gaming the metrics: bibliometric anomalies in global university rankings and the research integrity risk index (RI2)
• Understanding discrepancies in the coverage of OpenAlex: the case of China
• Qwen Technical Report
• LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models
• OpenAlex Snapshot
• Measuring Research Information Citizenship Across ORCID Practice
• Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic
• Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic
• Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations
• Web of Science and Scopus are not global databases of knowledge
• The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in Science
• A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field
• What Do Citation Counts Measure? An Updated Review of Studies on\n Citations in Scientific Documents Published between 2006 and 2018
• Over-Optimization of Academic Publishing Metrics: Observing Goodhart's\n Law in Action
• Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability
• On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness
• The Natural Selection of Bad Science
• A review of the literature on citation impact indicators
• Incremental Knowledge Base Construction Using DeepDive
• A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators
• Exploiting citation networks for large-scale author name disambiguation
• World citation and collaboration networks: uncovering the role of geography in science
• Persistence and Uncertainty in the Academic Career
• The inconsistency of the h-index
• A small world of citations? The influence of collaboration networks on citation practices
• Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations
• Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping
• The impact factor's Matthew effect: a natural experiment in bibliometrics
• Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience
• What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior
• Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science
• Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science
• The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999
• The simultaneous evolution of author and paper networks
• The structure of scientific collaboration networks
• The Strength of Weak Ties
• Centrality and network flow

Discussions

• Where Do Your Citations Come From? Citation-Constellation: A Free, Open-Source, No-Code, and Auditable Tool for Citation Network Decomposition with Complementary BARON and HEROCON Scores https://arxiv [bsky, 1 points, 0 comments]