2007/06/01 by Michael Ellman · 8 citations
Social Sciences · #Criminology #Demography #Deportation #Development economics #Economics #Emigration #European history and politics #Famine #Genocide #Gulag #Immigration #Industrialisation #Interpretation (philosophy) #Law #Political Conflict and Governance #Political economy #Political science #Population #Sociology #Soviet and Russian History #State (computer science) #Ukrainian
paper · doi:10.1080/09668130701291899
openalex publication_date 2007/06/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
This article contributes to the debate about the role of Stalin in the Soviet famine of 1932 – 33. It provides data on Stalin's statements and actions in 1932 – 33, judicial and extra-judicial repression, and the process by which the 1933 deportation targets were drastically reduced. It is suggested that starvation was a cheap substitute for the cancelled deportations. It is argued that in 1932 – 33 Stalin pursued a multi-pronged policy of state terror against the population of the USSR. Some general issues of interpretation are also considered, such as Bolshevik perceptions, the characterisation of Soviet industrialisation, and approaches to Soviet history. Extensive attention is given to the classification of Stalin's actions according to national and international criminal law. In particular, the question of whether or not in 1932 – 33 the Ukrainian people were victims of genocide, is analysed. Attentively studying the author's text, not only do [specialists] not stint their compliments, but they also make some critical remarks. Because (is it necessary to prove the obvious?) any really good book invites discussion (Ivanov Citation2006, p. 120). The Stalinist leadership was only able to retain power then [in 1932] by using the most savage repression (Khlevnyuk Citation1992, p. 11).