Raising Awareness for the Replication Crisis in Clinical Psychology by Focusing on Inconsistencies in Psychotherapy Research: How Much Can We Rely on Published Findings from Efficacy Trials?

2018/02/28 by Michael P. Hengartner · 2 citations
Psychology · #Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications #Mental Health Research Topics #Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

paper · pdf · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00256

openalex publication_date 2018/02/28 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/31

Abstract

OPINION article Front. Psychol., 28 February 2018Sec. Psychology for Clinical Settings Volume 9 - 2018 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00256

Citations

• Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
• Scope and Impact of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research
• The biomedical model of mental disorder: A critical analysis of its validity, utility, and effects on psychotherapy research
• Efficacy of treatments for anxiety disorders
• Is cognitive–behavioral therapy more effective than other therapies?
• Waiting list may be a nocebo condition in psychotherapy trials: a contribution from network meta‐analysis
• Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent Efficacy
• Psychological Treatments That Cause Harm
• A Systematic Review of Comparative Efficacy of Treatments and Controls for Depression
• A Vast Graveyard of Undead Theories
• False-Positive Psychology
• The effects of psychotherapy for adult depression are overestimated: a meta-analysis of study quality and effect size
• Biases in research: risk factors for non-replicability in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy research
• Scientific Utopia

Cited by

• Psychology [wikipedia]
• Replication crisis [wikipedia]