2020/05/11 by Eric McGhee · 1 citation
Social Sciences · Business, Management and Accounting · #Judicial and Constitutional Studies #Political Influence and Corporate Strategies #Regulation and Compliance Studies
paper · pdf · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-060118-045351
openalex publication_date 2020/05/11 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
Recent years have seen a tremendous surge of public interest in partisan gerrymandering, including robust reform efforts and multiple high-profile court cases. Political scientists have played an important role in this debate, reaching an unusually high level of public engagement. Yet this public-facing period has to some extent obscured promising avenues for future research within the discipline. I review the history of political science and redistricting and describe how research on this topic has been shaped by the newfound interest. The goals of the law differ from those of political science, so research that focuses squarely on the former often misses opportunities to advance the latter. I lay out the contours of this difference and then suggest reframing the existing metrics of partisan gerrymandering to make them useful for more traditionally scientific questions. Finally, I offer some ideas about what those future questions might look like when reframed in this way.