2014/07/31 by Alex Popinga, Tim Vaughan, Tanja Stadler +2
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology · Mathematics · Medicine · #Approximate Bayesian computation #Artificial intelligence #Bayes' theorem #Bayesian inference #Bayesian probability #Biology #Coalescent theory #Computer science #Data-Driven Disease Surveillance #Demography #Econometrics #Genetics #Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies #Inference #Influenza Virus Research Studies #Mathematics #Phylogenetic tree #Population #Statistics #q-bio.PE
paper · pdf · doi:10.1534/genetics.114.172791
Submitted
arxiv created 2014/12/19 · openalex publication_date 2014/12/19 · arxiv updated 2014/12/25 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
Estimation of epidemiological and population parameters from molecular sequence data has become central to the understanding of infectious disease dynamics. Various models have been proposed to infer details of the dynamics that describe epidemic progression. These include inference approaches derived from Kingman's coalescent theory. Here, we use recently described coalescent theory for epidemic dynamics to develop stochastic and deterministic coalescent susceptible-infected-removed (SIR) tree priors. We implement these in a Bayesian phylogenetic inference framework to permit joint estimation of SIR epidemic parameters and the sample genealogy. We assess the performance of the two coalescent models and also juxtapose results obtained with a recently published birth-death-sampling model for epidemic inference. Comparisons are made by analyzing sets of genealogies simulated under precisely known epidemiological parameters. Additionally, we analyze influenza A (H1N1) sequence data sampled in the Canterbury region of New Zealand and HIV-1 sequence data obtained from known United Kingdom infection clusters. We show that both coalescent SIR models are effective at estimating epidemiological parameters from data with large fundamental reproductive number [Formula: see text] and large population size [Formula: see text]. Furthermore, we find that the stochastic variant generally outperforms its deterministic counterpart in terms of error, bias, and highest posterior density coverage, particularly for smaller [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. However, each of these inference models is shown to have undesirable properties in certain circumstances, especially for epidemic outbreaks with [Formula: see text] close to one or with small effective susceptible populations.