2019/07/22 by Danielle L. LaFrance, Jonathan Tarbox · 64 citations
Neuroscience · Psychology · #Artificial intelligence #Autism Spectrum Disorder Research #Behavioral and Psychological Studies #Cognitive psychology #Cognitive science #Computer science #Developmental psychology #Generative grammar #Generativity #Perspective (graphical) #Psychology #Relational frame theory
paper · doi:10.1002/jaba.611
published in Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 53(1), 10-24 (Wiley)
openalex publication_date 2019/07/22 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/23
According to traditional linguistic accounts language, and its generative nature, cannot be taught. From a behavior analytic perspective, language is like any other behavior; it is learned and amenable to change. Based upon Skinner's radical behavioral analysis of verbal behavior, specific procedures have been designed to promote novel verbal relations. However, despite the strength and utility of this approach, using behavioral principles to understand the generativity of language has been challenging. Dependent upon the specific theory (e.g., stimulus equivalence, relational frame theory, bidirectional naming) within the radical behavioral orientation, researchers arrange unique procedures to evaluate the variables responsible for this phenomenon. This paper presents the commonalities and differences of two procedures (i.e., multiple exemplar training, multiple exemplar instruction) with examples of research highlighting the use of both in producing generativity. Further, it describes how multiple exemplar instruction is independent from other procedures leading to this outcome, and concludes by providing recommendations for both research and practice.