2019/10/01 by Sturt W. Manning, Jennifer Birch, Megan Anne Conger +5 · 3 citations
Earth and Planetary Sciences · Social Sciences · #Archaeology #Archaeology and Natural History #Archaeology and ancient environmental studies #Chronology #Geography #Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies #History #Radiocarbon dating
paper · pdf · doi:10.1017/aaq.2019.60
openalex publication_date 2019/10/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/04
Radiocarbon dating is rarely used in historical or contact-era North American archaeology because of idiosyncrasies of the calibration curve that result in ambiguous calendar dates for this period. We explore the potential and requirements for radiocarbon dating and Bayesian analysis to create a time frame for early contact-era sites in northeast North America independent of the assumptions and approximations involved in temporal constructs based on trade goods and other archaeological correlates. To illustrate, we use Bayesian chronological modeling to analyze radiocarbon dates on short-lived samples and a post from four Huron-Wendat Arendarhonon sites (Benson, Sopher, Ball, and Warminster) to establish an independent chronology. We find that Warminster was likely occupied in 1615–1616, and so is the most likely candidate for the site of Cahiagué visited by Samuel de Champlain in 1615–1616, versus the other main suggested alternative, Ball, which dates earlier, as do the Sopher and Benson sites. In fact, the Benson site seems likely to date ~50 years earlier than currently thought. We present the methods employed to arrive at these new, independent age estimates and argue that absolute redating of historic-era sites is necessary to accurately assess existing interpretations based on relative dating and associated regional narratives.